You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Horn
Somali pirates hijack oil tanker going to US
2009-12-01
[Asharq al-Aswat] Somali pirates seized a tanker carrying more than $20 million of crude oil from Saudi Arabia to the United States in the increasingly dangerous waters off East Africa, an official said Monday, an attack that could pose a huge environmental or security threat.

The Greece-flagged Maran Centaurus was hijacked Sunday about 800 miles (1,300 kilometers) off the coast of Somalia, said Cmdr. John Harbour, a spokesman for the EU Naval Force. Harbour said it originated from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and was destined for the United States. The ship has 28 crew members on board, he said.

The shipping intelligence company Lloyd's List said the Maran Centaurus is a "very large crude carrier, with a capacity of over 300,000 tons."

Stavros Hadzigrigoris from the ship's owners, Maran Tankers Management, said the tanker was carrying around 275,000 metric tons of crude. At an average price of around $75 a barrel, the cargo is worth more than $20 million. Hadzigrigoris declined to say who owned the oil.

Though pirates have successfully hijacked dozens of vessels the last several years, Sunday's attack appears to be only the second ever on an oil tanker. The hijacking of a tanker increases worries that the vessel could crash, be run aground or be involved in a firefight, said Roger Middleton, a piracy expert at London-based think tank Chatham House.

Pirates typically use guns and rocket-propelled grenades in their attacks, and some vessels now carry private security guards, but Middleton said oil tankers do not.

"You're sitting on a huge ship filled with flammable liquid. You don't want somebody with a gun on top of that," Middleton said. "Financially it's a very costly exercise because the value of oil is so volatile. If it is held for a long time and the price of oil drops, they could lost millions of dollars."

In November 2008, pirates hijacked the Saudi supertanker Sirius Star, which held 2 million barrels of oil valued at about $100 million. The tanker was released last January for a reported $3 million ransom after a two-month drama that helped galvanize international efforts to fight piracy off Africa's coast.

In late 2007, pirates hijacked a chemical tanker carrying up to 10,000 tons of highly explosive benzene. Initially, American intelligence agents worried terrorists from Somalia's Islamic extremist insurgency could be involved, and might try to crash the boat into an offshore oil platform or use it as a gigantic bomb. When the Japanese vessel was towed back into Somali waters and ransom demanded, the coalition was relieved to realize it was just another pirate attack.

Pirates now hold about a dozen vessels hostage and more than 200 crew members. The Maran Centaurus had 28 crew aboard, 16 Filipinos, nine Greeks, two Ukrainians and one Romanian, Harbour said.

Middleton said pirate demands and negotiations are becoming more complex.

"They still want the money but they have also asked for the release of imprisoned comrades," he said. "That demand is an extra bargaining tool they can use to add extra layers to their negotiating position."

Piracy has increased despite an increased presence by international navies patrolling the Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden. The U.S. this fall began flying sophisticated drones over East African waters as part of the fight against piracy.
Posted by:Fred

#14  Non-carrier aircraft have operated from various CVs/CVAs in the past, but more as a demonstration rather than any sort of continuious ops. If you can match the WOD ( wind over deck) requirements between the boat and the aircraft no cat or tailhook needed. C-1's and S-2's used to deck launch from Kitty Hawk class boats all the time. I believe that O-2's did also in Viet Nam. So if the takeoff and landing speeds of the A-10 could be met, then no reason why not.
Lockheed put together a small batch of U-2R's for boat ops, complete with a hook and folding wingtips, but eventually converted them back to the U-2S configuration. They launched via the deck run method.
Google up videos of the C-130 deck run and landing; the pilot selected reverse pitch whils still airborne in order to land.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2009-12-01 22:57  

#13  OP, not gonna happen. If they are going to court martial the SEAL team for giving some guy a fat lip, imagine what they would do if some Somali guy or gal sprained an ankle or had a heart attack seeing our forces offshore?
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-12-01 19:04  

#12  Not only would the back rip off on a carrier landing from the tail hook but it is likely it would rip the front landing gear out from the catapult shot.

Sorry no worky.

How about this: Land marines. Kick ass.
Posted by: Hellfish   2009-12-01 18:40  

#11  Anyone, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think of A-10s as being potentially useful in the Persian Gulf against the kind of small boats the Iranians would launch against us if we ever got into it with them.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2009-12-01 18:37  

#10  Hmmm, I just remembered Ospreys, they'd work.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-12-01 16:50  

#9  Yes barbara the Navy has welders, the problem is that aircraft designed for Carrier Take off and landing have reinforced airframes, you'd rip a A-10 in half without a lot of reinforcement.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-12-01 16:48  

#8  "but A-10's were not designed with tailhooks and other gear required for short landings"

Doesn't the Navy have any welders?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-12-01 16:01  

#7  Can do EASY
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-12-01 15:27  

#6  Harrier jet off a carrier?
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-12-01 15:20  

#5  Not a stupid ques at all. Taking off...no problem. It's the landings that might represent a challenge. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but A-10's were not designed with tailhooks and other gear required for short landings.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-12-01 14:53  

#4  "I'd pay good money to watch an encounter between a pirate "mother ship" and a pair of A-10s."

Hell, OP, if we make that Pay-per-View, we could retire the national debt. :-D

(Stupid question: why can't we fly A-10s off a carrier?)
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-12-01 14:34  

#3  Amen OP, and it would be another 250 years before we heard from them again!
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-12-01 14:29  

#2  All it would take to end this BS is one US carrier battle group with enough napalm to burn down even stone houses in Eyl or another of the various pirate dens, plus the stones to use it. We also need to find a way to fly A-10s from a carrier deck. I'd pay good money to watch an encounter between a pirate "mother ship" and a pair of A-10s.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-12-01 14:10  

#1  This sounds like a job for the Greek Navy...
Posted by: mojo   2009-12-01 12:54  

00:00