You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Background Rumor To The SEALs Court Martial
2009-12-02
From the website of Bob McCarty, Time Magazine's Man of the Year in 2006.
As my first investigative reporting effort related to the SEALs' case, I offer six important facts about the case you're likely not to read about in the mainstream media supplied to me by a source whom I cannot name inside the Pentagon:

1) The charges or accusations against the three Navy SEALs were not made from within the SEAL community. Sources tell me they came from someone within the Navy's Master-at-Arms community.

2) The SEALs were presented with the option of going to Captain's Mast for these charges but declined this form of non-judicial punishment and opted for court-martial instead. Why? Because they did not want to be judged by those outside of the SEAL community and believed the court-martial route would assure them the representation necessary to prove their innocence.
There was speculation here to that effect when the story broke.
3) At no time did anyone within the Naval Special Warfare community have any control over these accusations or events other than providing advice or guidance to the accused SEALs.

4) The integrity of the chain of custody of the prisoner is at question.

5) There are extenuating circumstances that indicate there is questionable evidence in some of the accusations made.

6) Evidence will come out in a court-martial that might not have come out in a Captain's Mast in favor of the accused SEALs.
If true, the result will make idiots think twice before trying something like this on again. What, after all, is the penalty for someone who deliberately brings false charges of this seriousness, besides ruining one's own military career?
Posted by: Anonymoose

#9  I think the Seals did the right thing. Captain's Mast only requires a perponderance of evidence to find you guilty - 51%, because the penalty level is much lower than what can be received in Court Marshal. It is imminently possible that politics throughout the chain of command can influence the result of a Captain's Mass. A Court Marhsal will decided on evidence. If you are innocent, you should choose court marshal to prevent some careerist from throwing you under the bus to protect his future promotability.
Posted by: Super Hose   2009-12-02 23:20  

#8  Of course, next time the SEALs capture a high value target, unfortunately, the HVT will probably be killed while trying to escape. Or he will have a hidden weapon on him, and the SEALs will have to shoot him in self defense. Before they get back to base.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-12-02 18:09  

#7  There's a story making the rounds that Obama is sending a "message" to the SEALS as payback for violating his rules of engagement when rescuing the captain of the Maersk Alabama this past April. Take it with a grain of salt.
Posted by: DMFD   2009-12-02 17:13  

#6  The SJA better help them prep for this. I do not wnat to see these good men harmed in any way by these idiots.

I wonder where my stud book is?
Posted by: newc   2009-12-02 16:09  

#5  lawyer, write it down. I will bet the balance of my retirement that a lawyer is behind this. Someone with an axe to grind or a chip on his/her/it's shoulder.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge    2009-12-02 15:17  

#4  While I am not up on Courts Marshall procedures, I believe the accusers will have to confront the accused. Should be interesting.
Posted by: tipover   2009-12-02 13:52  

#3  the accusers must be fools
Posted by: 746   2009-12-02 11:24  

#2  the treasonous offences are being made by the accusers
Posted by: chris   2009-12-02 11:20  

#1  SEALS committing treasonous offences, I think NOT.
Posted by: 746   2009-12-02 10:47  

00:00