You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Another flight disrupted by a group of Muslims
2009-12-11
It happened again on Wednesday, December 9, 2009, less than a month after the incident aboard AirTran Flight 297. United Airlines Flight 227, scheduled to depart Denver International Airport at 1:50 pm Wednesday for Los Angeles was disrupted when several passengers who were described as Middle Eastern in appearance, confirmed by this investigator to be a group of Muslims traveling together, were removed from that aircraft due to suspicious behavior that originated in the terminal and continued to the airplane. Their behavior was consistent in some respects to the behavior of the Muslim passengers aboard AirTran Flight 297 on November 17, 2009 that caused a flurry of controversy over its legitimacy, and the now infamous case of the “Flying Imams” of 2006.

According to information obtained by this investigator, seven men of Middle Eastern appearance, boarded flight 227. Two took their seats in coach, while five took their seats in the first class section of the plane. At a critical pre-flight point, the individuals appeared to act in concert with one another, changing seats and moving stowed luggage to very specific areas of the aircraft, often having to move the stowed bags of other passengers to do so. They disobeyed or otherwise ignored the admonitions of the flight attendants to remain seated.

Their behavior was so overt and so apparently choreographed, according to our sources, that the flight crew demanded the passengers be removed from the aircraft. One report found on 9News in Denver quoted John Sloan, a passenger aboard that flight: “I have never seen flight attendants so scared in my life. Everything turned out OK, but it was not a very good feeling..”

Following the removal of the passengers, officials brought a bomb-sniffing dogs aboard the aircraft, focusing of the first class section of the plane. Subsequent to the search that found nothing, the offending passengers were removed from the flight and rebooked on another aircraft to their destination. According to federal officials, no criminal investigation is being launched into this incident, which was described as a “customer service” matter.

Early this morning, this investigator spoke to a law enforcement source in Denver who is intimately familiar with the incident. Many details have not been publicly reported about this incident, although it is clear that there is an agenda at play. Based on information obtained from this source and others relating to the previous flights disrupted by the deliberate behavior of Muslim passengers, it is clear that the airline industry, as well as the sensibilities of normal Americans, is under attack through Islamic ideological jihad. Additional information will be provided once our investigation is complete.
Posted by:ryuge

#7  My "Rule of Three":

The first time is happenstance (OK, you've got my attention).

The second time is coincidence (It has become more interesting).

The third time is enemy action (And time for me to do likewise)....
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2009-12-11 08:52  

#6  Just once I'd like the "Jihadis" to pull something like this on a flight full of SF troops in mufti. The airport would likely have to be shut down until the FOD (foreign objects/debris) is cleared from the runways, but a good time would be had by all (except the "jihadis").
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-12-11 04:10  

#5  compare the 9news story to the "canadianfreepress" story.

9news says

"Sloan says the men were attempting to change seats with other passengers. Another passenger, who doesn't want his name used, says the men were also trying to move luggage while the plane was getting ready to push back"

Leads to

6)Rude middle easterners violating aircraft etiquette, for their own convenience, thus creating the patter our security folks are supposed to look for.

My smoke alarm went off cause I burned the roast, there was no fire, but I was still happy with my smoke alarm.

Nothing to see, move along.

Maybe.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2009-12-11 03:23  

#4  5. an unreliable news organization

should not be ruled out
Posted by: liberalhawk   2009-12-11 03:18  

#3  So is this:

1) psy-ops to spook and rattle us?

2) dry run for a big airplane ka-boom?

3) set up for a 'discrimantion' lawsuit?

4) fraternity initiation rite?

Inquiring minds want to know ...
Posted by: Steve White   2009-12-11 13:51  

#2  It certainly warrants a follow up.
Posted by: newc   2009-12-11 10:54  

#1  internment camps
Posted by: 746   2009-12-11 10:41  

00:00