| Submit your comments on this article |
| Britain |
| This is England |
| 2009-12-29 |
| Their aim? To drive out Islamic extremism. Their weapon? The thugs of Britain's most violent football gangs |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #16 ION PAKISTANI DEFENCE FORUM > GLOBAL TINDERBOX: "THE ECONOMIST" SAYS 2010 COULD BE THE YEAR WHICH SPARKS WORLDWIDE SOCIAL UNREST. ARTIC > Countries deemed at "LOW RISK" of SOCIAL UNREST in 2010 are, to wit: * NORAM = CANADA-USA * GREENLAND * ICELAND * BRAZIL * SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES * GERMANY [ + Most of CENTRAL, EASTERN EUROPE] * AUSTRALIA [OZ Land] * NEW ZEALAND AND - drum roll, iff you please, Moriarity - LIBYA [aka DA KOLONEL = UNCLE QADDAFI]??? NAXAL, MAOIST TRUBLED INDIA > ranked "HIGH RISK" ON PAR WID BRITAIN + FRANCE??? REST OF THE WORLD MAY GO "BOOM" IN 2010 [1980's MTV Video > "Things that May You Go UMMMM"]. ------------------------------- GLOBAL TIMES.CN > CHINA'S GDP PER CAPITA FOR END-OF-YEAR 2010 IS USD 4000, CHINA STILL RANKS IN THE CATEGORY OF "MIDDLE-LOW" INCOME COUNTRY. ARTIC > back in the 1960's, the UNO set USD 3000 as being a "MODERNIZED COUNTRY", the equivalent of US$8000-10,000 today. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2009-12-29 20:39 |
| #15 The author is a fearmonger and nothing more. Where was he when the muslim protester held up the "Behead those who insult Islam" sign??? Case in point. He attempts to use the following excerpt to demonstrate that the EDL is not a peaceful organization as it purports to be: "He sticks to the 'peaceful movement' mantra but a text I later receive from him ahead of an EDL demo in London reveals his involvement with the hooligans. It reads: 'Right lads, the "unofficial" meet for the 31st (London) is going to be 12 o'clock at The Hole In The Wall pub just outside Waterloo Station. I will be there just before that. Remember lads were (sic) going as Casuals Utd and if you could obtain a poppy to wear it would make us look good even if we are kicking off. lol. Cheers lads. Joel "Arsenal" Titus.' The above excerpt in no way suggests violence. This article is shi*. |
| Posted by: Kojo Uneremp9754 2009-12-29 19:31 |
| #14 (3) Therefore the only just use of force is by the state against its non-immigrant preferably white & male citizens. FYP |
| Posted by: Uliper Fillmore5763 2009-12-29 18:18 |
| #13 Love how they try to paint the EDL as "neo-Nazis" I don't know squat about the EDL. But just look at how the MSM treated the Minutemen along the borders. You would think they were shooting men, women, and children on sight. To the left (and the MSM) anything which they don't approve of is Facist and Nazi (that would be Nazi as in National socialist). |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2009-12-29 15:13 |
| #12 However, when the people feel they are no longer being protected then they will protect themselves. What did the left think would happen? The Left doesn't think, they FEEL! And I am looking forward to when they get to FEEL some of the pent up rage and hatred I have for them. |
| Posted by: Ebbaiger Borgia1315 2009-12-29 14:19 |
| #11 'Our leaders in this country no longer represent us,' he says. This response is to be expected. As a society we had given the monopoly of force and retribution to the police and the courts. This used to work reasonably well. However, when the people feel they are no longer being protected then they will protect themselves. What did the left think would happen? |
| Posted by: Chemist 2009-12-29 14:04 |
| #10 I agree with the guy asked why he couldn't cover his face but the muslim women can. Also the caption under the pic about the woman being intimidated. You wouldn't be able too blow air up my ass every time one of them stepped onto the bus either |
| Posted by: chris 2009-12-29 11:57 |
| #9 Let's follow the line of argument in a Euro fashion. (1) Per the head of German protestant churches, there is no such thing as a just war. (2) Per the British government, the state should have an exclusive monopoly on force. (3) Therefore the only just use of force is by the state against its citizens. |
| Posted by: lotp 2009-12-29 11:47 |
| #8 Love how they try to paint the EDL as "neo-Nazis" but the Nazis won't march with them because some of the EDL are black *and* one of their causes is the Islamic oppression of women. The press loves to cast the violent into two sets: leftists, who are noble of intention and only doing what they must against an oppressive state; and fascists who are just interested in oppressing everyone. That there might be people willing to be violent in defense of liberty simply doesn't register in their minds. |
| Posted by: Rob Crawford 2009-12-29 10:47 |
| #7 The police are here in force, too. 'Take that mask off,' barks a sergeant to one young man. He does so immediately but protests: 'Why are they allowed to wear burkas in public but we're not allowed to cover our faces?' 'Just do what you're told,' the policeman snaps Coming soon to a country near you, unless something is done to end this nonsense. |
| Posted by: WolfDog 2009-12-29 10:14 |
| #6 Hope they get some guns. |
| Posted by: Creamble Borgia6423 2009-12-29 09:46 |
| #5 Looks like the original Daily Mail article wasn't accepting comments. Don't blame them - that's a comment thread which would have gone nuclear very shortly. |
| Posted by: Sgt. Mom 2009-12-29 09:38 |
| #4 For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction? |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2009-12-29 09:15 |
| #3 When the country's leaders don't speak up the people will. See also: Mark Steyn |
| Posted by: Parabellum 2009-12-29 08:13 |
| #2 I LIKE it. But , that's just me. How do you like it when its done back to you? You want to play? PBUH in your face. |
| Posted by: Angleton9 2009-12-29 07:53 |
| #1 This is no surprise. By constantly supporting and defending indefensible extremist Muslims and Muslim practices the 'leaders' were forcing the rest of Britain towards a polarized state. That validates extremist groups as a necessary counter to the defended extreme Muslims. It will probably get a lot worse. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2009-12-29 07:45 |