You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caribbean-Latin America
Chavez says U.S. occupying Haiti in name of aid
2010-01-18
Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez on Sunday accused the United States of using the earthquake in Haiti as a pretext to occupy the devastated Caribbean country and offered to send fuel from his OPEC nation.

"I read that 3,000 soldiers are arriving, Marines armed as if they were going to war. There is not a shortage of guns there, my God. Doctors, medicine, fuel, field hospitals, that's what the United States should send," Chavez said on his weekly television show. "They are occupying Haiti undercover."

"On top of that, you don't see them in the streets. Are they picking up bodies? ... Are they looking for the injured? You don't see them. I haven't seen them. Where are they?"

Chavez promised to send as much gasoline as Haiti needs for electricity generation and transport.

A perennial foe of U.S. "imperialism," Chavez said he did not wish to diminish the humanitarian effort made by the United States and was only questioning the need for so many troops.

The United States is sending more than 5,000 Marines and soldiers to Haiti, and a hospital ship is due to arrive later this week.

The country's president said U.S. troops would help keep order on Haiti's increasingly lawless streets.

Venezuela has sent several planes to Haiti with doctors, aid and some soldiers. A Russia-Venezuela mission was set to leave Venezuela on Monday carrying aid on Russian planes.

Chavez said Venezuela's planes were the first to land in Haiti after Tuesday's 7.0 magnitude earthquake, which wrecked the capital Port-Au-Prince and killed as many as 200,000 people.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Puerto Rico is a big enough pain. Why would we want to take Haiti, an island with no natural resources, a non-English speaking, desperately poor nation in a not particularly strategic position? There is no upside with Haiti. If we wanted to occupy a country, Venezuela would be a better bet.
Posted by: rwv   2010-01-18 22:04  

#4  WMF > "TIME" MAGAZINE US MEDIA: HAITI IS ALMOST A 51st US STATE IN TERMS OF SCALE OF US GOVT-LED DISASTER RELIEF, RESOURCES MOBILIZATION.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-01-18 20:36  

#3  HMMMMMM, HMMMMM, HUGO versus FREEREPUBLIC/OTHER > THE US SHOULD ANNEX HAITI + ANNEX HAITI.

PRO-ANNEXATION Bloggers > ALA YEMEN + AL QAEDA, the US should seemingly annex Haiti to

* RESOLVE THE COUNTRY'S PERENNIAL PROBS WID EXCESSIVE POVERTY + POOR GOVT, +
* "PREEMPT" RADIC ISLAM, etc. MILITANTS-TERROR GROUPS FROM EXPLOITING HAITI'S POVERTY + SETTING UP MILTERR NETWORKS IN THE AMERICAS.

MSM-NET > Myriad News Reports of Commie Groups colluding wid Radical Islamist Groups > COMMUNIST CUBA will next door to AL QAEDA's new base in Haiti off FLORIDA + US SOUTH + MEXICA, wid HUGO to the south???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-01-18 18:26  

#2  Oh yes, we need more voodoo dolls and AIDS.
Posted by: HammerHead   2010-01-18 18:03  

#1  What *did* happen to that Venezuelan team which showed up so photogenically at Port-au-Prince? Are they still in country, or was it just a "show the flag" sort of deal?
Posted by: Mitch H.   2010-01-18 16:47  

00:00