You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Podesta: Martha Coakley will win in Massachusetts despite 'lackluster' campaign
2010-01-18
Top Democratic operative John Podesta expressed cautious optimism on Saturday that the Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts, Martha Coakley, would defeat Republican Scott Brown in Tuesday's special election, despite running what he called a "lackluster campaign."

"I'm glad the election is this Tuesday instead of last Tuesday," Podesta told The Daily Caller. "Had the election been last Tuesday there would have been a lot higher chance she would have lost."

Podesta served as White House chief of staff under President Bill Clinton and now runs the Center for American Progress, which has become a powerhouse liberal Democratic think tank over the last few years.

He said that the flood of national Democratic resources into the state, to run television ads and organize get out the vote efforts, would likely combine with President Obama's visit to the state Sunday afternoon to give Coakley the edge.

"It's highly likely the president's visit will push her over the finish line," Podesta said.

Podesta also said there are "a number of paths," including reconciliation, to getting the president's health-care reform bill through the Congress even if Democrats lose their Senate seat in Massachusetts on Tuesday.
Posted by:Fred

#9  


Podesta is whistling in the graveyard!


Podesta is reminding constituents to vote

Posted by: BigEd   2010-01-18 19:30  

#8  Podesta is whistling in the graveyard!
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-01-18 17:56  

#7  I think he's wrong. The ads are pissing people off. And Obama looked like some guy who stopped in while on the way to get a coupla bets down on the playoff games instead of President of the United States. Did he ever hear of a tie?
I think he's gonna win and easier then most people think. But what do I know next to some Clintonista think tank running guy?
Posted by: tu3031   2010-01-18 15:52  

#6  That's because they'v e got MUTV, make up the vote.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-01-18 15:39  

#5  There may be a dirty little secret the media and the Dems won't talk about: in Mass, there is no Dem GOTV.

It has never been needed.
Posted by: Skunky Glins****   2010-01-18 15:03  

#4  If it's not close, they can't cheat (much).
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-01-18 13:30  

#3  The following people have already voted for Martha Coakley via Absentee Ballot:

Andrews, Mary E.
Androski, Peter David
Bonelli, George A.
Brown, Marguerite (Dressner)
Byrne, David M.
Cabot, Lawrence Thompson
Canesi, Ellen (Cullinane)
Chiasson, Margaret Josephine (Shomph)
Clarence Jr., Stanley
Codair-Trimble, Elizabeth A. (Randall)
Cook, Gerald C.J.
D'Angeli, Steven
Donnelly, Enes M. (Leccacorvi)
Ellis, Lorraine E. (Gordon)
Feeley, G. Russell
Giuliani-Giuliano, Sabatina M. (Cardello)
Goguen, Hectorine L. (Leger)
Good, Jennifer Claire
Gualtieri, John
Haley, Elizabeth (Flood)
Hegarty, Rev Daniel P.
Hirtle, Joyce Skinner
Hurley, Daniel B.
Kamholz, Rita Gertrude
Kearney, Elizabeth G. "Bessie" (Wipperman)
Kimball, Marie B. (MacDonnell)
LoRusso, Mary (Sciola)
Mann, Mary E. (Cahill)


Kennedy, Senator Edward M. "Ted" (Featured)
Posted by: ED SCHULTZ2010   2010-01-18 12:55  

#2  I'm afraid we'll get another cliff hanger complete with challenges and counter-challenges to the final outcome, hanging chads, misplaced absentee ballots, etc., etc. Then it'll all go before a bunch of loonie judges who won't really care what the tally was. They'll do what they were put on the bench to do and that's to certify Coakley's victory. Has a fund been established for Scott Brown's legal team yet?
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2010-01-18 12:38  

#1  I'm afraid at the end of the day when the people of Boston go to vote, they will vote by party.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2010-01-18 11:41  

00:00