You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Nothing Madisonian in this Martha
2010-01-18
No matter what happens at the ballot box tomorrow, one thing is certain: Martha Coakley is a loser.

Even if Bill Clinton and Barack Obama can somehow rescue her candidacy, Coakley will never recover from the self-inflicted damage of the worst political campaign in recent history.

Win or lose, she will forever be Martha the Blind - the woman who couldn't see terrorists in Afghanistan, or a staffer giving a beatdown to a reporter right before her eyes. She's Sen. Spellcheck, forced to pull one ad because her campaign misspelled Massachusetts, then another because it superimposed Scott Brown's image in front of the World Trade Center.
Win or lose, she will forever be Martha the Blind - the woman who couldn't see terrorists in Afghanistan, or a staffer giving a beatdown to a reporter right before her eyes. She's Sen. Spellcheck, forced to pull one ad because her campaign misspelled Massachusetts, then another because it superimposed Scott Brown's image in front of the World Trade Center.

Given the incompetence of her campaign, she was lucky it was a pre-9/11 photo of the towers.

In the Democratic primary, Coakley ran on the one thing she couldn't get wrong: being a woman. It's been downhill ever since.

Right after losing the primary, Rep. Michael Capuano was asked what he learned on the campaign trail. "You're screwed," he told his Democratic colleagues. Everyone wondered what he meant. Now we know.

While Scott Brown was wearing out a set of truck tires on retail politics, Coakley sniffed at the idea of "standing outside Fenway Park, in the cold, shaking hands." She certainly didn't waste time explaining her positions on health care or national security to the voters, in part because when she tried, it became painfully clear she didn't understand them herself.

Coakley's arrogant assumption of victory was so strong that midway through the brief campaign season, she simply disappeared off the campaign trail for days.

When independent voters and moderate Democrats were wondering if Coakley was out of touch, she answered by jetting off to Washington for a big-dollar lobbyist fundraiser.
When independent voters and moderate Democrats were wondering if Coakley was out of touch, she answered by jetting off to Washington for a big-dollar lobbyist fundraiser. Why didn't she just stop by AIG and present them with a bonus check while she was at it?

Then suddenly she found herself in a competitive political race. And how did Coakley respond? She threw a political tantrum.

Voters were deluged with Coakley's attack ads - so many they could barely fit in the commercial breaks. Dark, ominous and ugly, Coakley's media message was the polar opposite to that offered by smiling Scott Brown.

In the end, Coakley spent millions on TV ads that actually drove her own numbers down.

And then, as though to prove she couldn't do anything right, she held a fundraiser starring the U.N. envoy to Haiti.

What was Coakley thinking, having Bill Clinton at a $2,400-per-person fundraiser at the Fairmont Copley while crying Haitian families were clawing through the rubble looking for loved ones? Is rescuing a desperately incompetent Democrat really more important than saving the
This is the kind of political stupidity it takes for a Democrat to lose a Senate race in Massachusetts. You can't just run a weak campaign, or commit a gaffe or two. You've got to run an absolute disaster of a campaign to lose to a Republican here.
starving of Haiti?

This is the kind of political stupidity it takes for a Democrat to lose a Senate race in Massachusetts. You can't just run a weak campaign, or commit a gaffe or two. You've got to run an absolute disaster of a campaign to lose to a Republican here.

And that's what Coakley delivered. It wasn't the Hindenburg or the Titanic. It was the Hindenburg crashing into the Titanic.
Posted by:Fred

#5  You forgot to mention the hot curling iron, Tu3031.
Posted by: Eric Jablow   2010-01-18 19:29  

#4  Voters were deluged with Coakley's attack ads - so many they could barely fit in the commercial breaks. Dark, ominous and ugly, Coakley's media message was the polar opposite to that offered by smiling Scott Brown.

Reeeeeeeepublican Scott Brown. Scott Brown, Reeeeeeeepublican. Reeeeeeeepublican Scott Brown. He drives a gas guzzling, polluting truck and personally revels in the destruction it causes to the environment. Reeeeeeeepublican Scott Brown will pick up old friends George Bush and Dick Cheney at the airport, drive to your house in his truck, rape your women, deny them an abortion, and watch happily as George Bush and Dick Cheney kill and eat your children. Reeeeeeeepublican Scott Brown and his good friends George Bush and Dick Cheney will then ransack your house, take every dollar you own and have you fired from your job. If Reeeeeeeepublican Scott Brown is elected, he will personally swear allegience to good friends George Bush and Dick Cheney and head to Washington to destroy health care in America and lynch President Obama as his masters George Bush and Dick Cheney, Big Bankers and Wall Street have commanded him to do.
That's why Massachusettes needs Marcia Coakley. She's...she's...a woman! And Vicki Kennedy sez Ted's ghost came to her in the night crying and told her that he want's you to vote for Marcia Coakley and honor his life long dream of being responsible for spending trillions of dollars even from the grave. And isn't that a legacy we can all be proud of?

The ads aren't that bad. But they're close. And there's still a day left...
Posted by: tu3031   2010-01-18 15:39  

#3  "In the end, Coakley spent millions on TV ads that actually drove her own numbers down."

I love it when a plan comes together fails so spectacularly. :-D
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-01-18 13:28  

#2  Is rescuing a desperately incompetent Democrat really more important than saving the starving of Haiti?

That's a ridiculous question. Of course it is.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2010-01-18 12:28  

#1  Scott Brown was wearing out a set of truck tires

and destroying the planet with all the CO2 emitted by that monster truck.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-01-18 12:15  

00:00