You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Coakley adviser memo: D.C. Dems 'failed' Coakley
2010-01-19
The Coakley campaign is bridling at finger-pointing from the White House and Washington Democrats, and outside adviser to the campaign has provided to POLITICO a memo aimed at rebutting the charge that Coakley failed, and making the case that national Democrats failed her.

The adviser, who made the case to my colleague Jonathan Martin on the condition of anonymity in response, he said, to "the current leaking coming out of the White House and the DNC that is chalking all of this up to a “bad candidate'.

The adviser, who cited internal polling numbers to make the case, emails that, "There's more to the story than that. If Martha is guilty of taking the race for granted, so is the White House, and the DNC."

The adviser pointed to internal polling to argue that Coakley held a wide -- 20 point -- lead on December 19, and that the damage she took between that survey and a January 5 Rasmussen poll putting the race at 9 points came from the national scene: The Senate vote on Health Care, with the controversy over Ben Nelson's deal for Nebraska, and the Christmas Day bombing.

The Coakley adviser's memo:

National Dems Failed to Aid Coakley Until Too Late

-- Coakley campaign provided national Democrats with all poll results since early December

-- Coakley campaign noted concerns about "apathy" and failure of national Democrats to contribute early in December. Coakley campaign noted fundraising concerns throughout December and requested national Democratic help.

-- DNC and other Dem organizations did not engage until the week before the election, much too late to aid Coakley operation


Brown Capitalized on Concerns About National Democrats

-- From the beginning, Brown labeled President Obama's health care and cap and trade plans as tax increases. Polling throughout the race showed this to be the most effective attack on Coakley.

-- Coakley's lead dropped significantly after the Senate passed health care reform shortly before Christmas and after the Christmas Eve "bombing" incident. Polling showed significant concerns with the actions of Senator Nelson to hold out for a better deal. Senator Nelson's actions specifically hurt Coakley who was forced to backtrack on her opposition to the abortion restriction amendment.

-- Democrats concerns with Obama's Afghanastain plan forced Coakley to oppose the Afghan war in the primary, which hurt her in the general.

Claims about Coakley's Scant Campaigning and Miscues Were exaggerated

-- Because of the failure of national Democrats to support Coakley, she was forced to devote significant time to fundraising in December. She also released a variety of plans in December and had a public event nearly every day.

-- Coakley's failure to release television advertisments until 12 days before the election was the result of a fundraising problem that national Democrats failed to resolve. Meanwhile, right wing groups pumped significant amounts of money into Brown's campaign allowing him to go up with ads first, including negative attack ads funded by the Swift Boat and Willie Horton groups.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#12  She ran one of the most inept campaigns in recent memory (worse than McStain McCain).

Insulting Fenway and common people, calling Schilling Yankee fan, bigoted remarks that Catholics should stay out of medical care providing, etc.

She is the perfect end product of a single party in power - unaccountable, elitist and entitled. THere are a lot more like her in COngress for the same reasons. 2010 there is hope we may actually see some of the rascals thrown out.
Posted by: OldSpook   2010-01-19 21:49  

#11  According to Drudge, Coakley threw in the towel.
Posted by: DarthVader   2010-01-19 21:21  

#10  "Ummm. popcorn!"

Extra butter with that, DMFD?

Glad I got an extra boxcar load this month. :-D
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-01-19 21:17  

#9  53% in - Brown 53% Coakley 46% on Fox
Posted by: Frank G   2010-01-19 20:59  

#8  Ummm. popcorn!
Posted by: DMFD   2010-01-19 20:21  

#7  And if they're throwing shit at each other even before the polls close, I have a feeling the ground should start shaking here about ten o'clock. It'll be Ted spinning in his grave.
Posted by: tu3031   2010-01-19 20:07  

#6  Return fire from a "senior party official". I'm betting at least a "commissar"...

"This memo is a pack full of lies and fantasies - The DNC and the DSCC did everything they were asked and have been involved in the race for several weeks not just the last one -The campaign failed to recognize this threat, failed to keep Coakley on the campaign trail, failed to create a negative narrative about Brown, failed to stay on the air in December while he was running a brilliant campaign. It's wishful thinking from a pollster, candidate and campaign team that were caught napping and are going to allow one of the worst debacle in American political history to happen on their watch that they are at the 11th hour are going to blame others. Before the DNC and DSCC got involved there was barely a single piece of paper on what the narrative is on Brown. The candidate in this race and the campaign have been involved in the worst case of political malpractice in memory and they aren't going to be able to spin themselves out of this with a memo full of lies."

She's AG until 2012. That should be about it for her. I don't think the party will back "the woman who blew Ted Kennedy's senate seat" for dog officer.
Posted by: tu3031   2010-01-19 20:03  

#5  Latest Intrade - Brown:82 | Coakley: 16.
Ready, forks, go?
Posted by: twobyfour   2010-01-19 17:49  

#4  I've always wanted to watch a circular firing squad. This looks to be an outstanding example.
Posted by: tipover   2010-01-19 17:24  

#3  complacent, out of touch diva

Isn't that a perfect description of every Demon in a leadership role?
Posted by: AlanC   2010-01-19 17:00  

#2  Fratricide! Fratricide!
Posted by: Mike   2010-01-19 16:57  

#1  It's a bad sign when you've decided to do the autopsy before the patient is dead. Especially when you're the patient.
She blames them, they blame her...too bad that graphic doesn't spin. Truth is, this should've been a slam dunk for her with minimal effort. Too bad she was a complacent, out of touch diva who expected the state to just roll out the red carpet for her all the way to DC.
But them's the breaks...
Posted by: tu3031   2010-01-19 16:25  

00:00