You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
AIG bonuses legal, says US pay czar
2010-02-04
[Iran Press TV Latest] AIG is considering plans to pay its employees USD 100 million in bonuses using the bailout money it has received to keep afloat, with government officials saying the payments are legal.

The decision by the American International Group to pay special bonuses, similar to those paid a year earlier, has unleashed a political frenzy with critics arguing that the company should not use the taxpayers' money to pay big bonuses to its employees.

The US government paymaster, Kenneth Feinberg, who is in charge of examining how the bailout money is spent and paid back, defended AIG's decision arguing that the payments, despite creating outrage, were made based on legally binding contracts.

"These are old grandfather contracts that have the legal force of law," Feinberg told ABC's Good Morning America on Wednesday, AFP reported.

The payments, confirmed by a source close to the matter, were part of a deal in which employees agreed to accept less than they were owed to in exchange for early payouts. The move was an effort to stem the outrage that occurred last year.

Republican Senator Charles Grassley said by paying the new bonuses, "AIG has taxpayers over a barrel. The Obama administration has been outmaneuvered."

Feinberg, however, dismissed the Republican's claim, saying that the payments would end in March. "It ends this March with the last of these retention payments. Another month or so, these old, guaranteed bonuses will be a thing of the past," he said.

The bonuses by the giant insurance company have their roots in employment contracts signed in 2007 that fall outside the jurisdiction of Feinberg, who is responsible for monitoring where the bailout money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program ends up.
Posted by:Fred

#7  Legal. But wrong. Sort of like the tea tax etc. of 1773.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-02-04 22:10  

#6  Â“The payments, confirmed by a source close to the matter, were part of a deal in which employees agreed to accept less than they were owed to in exchange for early payouts.”

Just the other day Timothy Geithner called the AIG bonuses an "outrageous failure of policy." Ironic, isn’t it, that it was Feinberg and Geithner himself who negotiated the terms. Let’s be clear. The whole scheme was cooked to delay the public’s outrage over the first bonus dough. It’s also important to note that the agreement was that current AIG employees would accept 10 percent cutbacks to receive a bonus. And employees who already left the company must take 20 percent cuts. Just remember, when Obama feigns rightous indignation and calls for “Bank fees” to recoup taxpayer dollars it was his Treasury Department that cut this deal in the first place.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2010-02-04 12:38  

#5  You don't want them using government (our) money for bonuses? Don't give them government (our) money.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2010-02-04 12:31  

#4  These are contractural obligations as I understand it, to not pay them would be breach of contract...outmaneuvered? Congress and President just handed out all that money without accountability or conditions. The theory was that even though the executives may or may not have been part of the problem they needed to stay in place as they were/are familiar with the system and needed to get it fixed. Does it look bad, sure, but this is what happens when negotiating without preconditions. If the grapes are sour, then maybe Congress/President should have taken an extra week or more to get the ducks lined up before signing a blank check.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2010-02-04 10:57  

#3  Obama should just issue an executive order nullifying those contracts. After all, he is the President (and above even the czars).
/sarcasm
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2010-02-04 07:20  

#2  An excerpt from a history textbook, 2027: "...things were going from bad to worse during the czarist regime"...
Posted by: twobyfour   2010-02-04 04:59  

#1  These are old grandfather contracts that have the legal force of law Such contracts are trumped by bankruptcy. They would have been voided had AIG gone under.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2010-02-04 00:21  

00:00