You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
US government rescinds 'leave internet alone' policy
2010-02-28
The US government's policy of leaving the Internet alone is over, according to Obama's top official at the Department of Commerce.

Instead, an "Internet Policy 3.0" approach will see policy discussions between government agencies, foreign governments, and key Internet constituencies, according to Assistant Secretary Larry Strickling, with those discussions covering issues such as privacy, child protection, cybersecurity, copyright protection, and Internet governance.

The outcomes of such discussions will be "flexible" but may result in recommendations for legislation or regulation, Strickling said in a speech at the Media Institute in Washington this week.
Let's just guess that it means more government control for the sake of 'fairness' and the 'little people' ...
The new approach is a far cry from a US government that consciously decided not to intrude into the internet's functioning and growth and in so doing allowed an academic network to turn into a global communications phenomenon.

Strickling referred to these roots arguing that it was "the right policy for the United States in the early stages of the Internet, and the right message to send to the rest of the world." But, he continued, "that was then and this is now. As we at NTIA approach a wide range of Internet policy issues, we take the view that we are now in the third generation of Internet policy making."

Outlining three decades of internet evolution - from transition to commercialization, from the garage to Main Street, and now, starting in 2010, the "Policy 3.0" approach - Strickling argued that with the internet is now a social network as well a business network. "We must take rules more seriously."
Posted by:Fred

#11  Once more, Asymmetrical Triangulation.

I think we missed it the first two times.
Posted by: Pappy   2010-02-28 23:15  

#10  PhD. Marc LaMont Hill, Prof of Adv. Urban Studies, is very cute and has a great smile!!

By all accounts, "He's a Keeper", Right, Sean?
Posted by: Asymmetrical Triangulation    2010-02-28 22:34  

#9  PhD. Marc LaMont Hill, Prof of Adv. Urban Studies, is very cute and has a great smile!!

By all accounts, "He's a Keeper", Right, Sean?
Posted by: Asymmetrical Triangulation    2010-02-28 22:17  

#8  Bob Beckel is likely the "fat jerk" referred to. He's great as he doesn't change a single GOP or Conservative mind, and is so obnoxious he likely turns off even the Donks and Independents who watch. I saw the one where his brother, actor and much more conservative, went at it. Graham kicked his ass
Posted by: Frank G   2010-02-28 16:56  

#7  Fox getting successful they are going more cautious, giving voice to Dem spokesjerks like Juan Williams and that fat jerk Hannity keeps bringing on. NoMoreBS

Dr. Marc Lamont Hill, Professor, Author, Speaker, Public Intellectual.... is my alltime personal fav.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-02-28 16:37  

#6  Because there in not one single aspect of individual liberty, especially free speech, that this bunch of social*st bastar*s don't want to control, especially the part about dissent.
Barry now understands that talk radio and the internet, not broadcast media, is the last bastion of freedom and the powerful forces opposing his BS. Since Fox is limited to cable and a relatively small section of the populace who were going for Barry anyway, it has an effect but they have been somewhat able to contain it. And with Fox getting successful they are going more cautious, giving voice to Dem spokesjerks like Juan Williams and that fat jerk Hannity keeps bringing on.
So regulate the internet, go for censorship guised as fairnes doctrine part 2, and opposition diminishes.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2010-02-28 16:28  

#5  Well, look at all the other countries who have laid the light touch of government on the Internet - China, Iran, Libya, that country that used to be Burma, and -- do they have computers in North Korea?.
Posted by: Bobby   2010-02-28 11:12  

#4  The bottom line is that the Internet has created unparalleled freedom of expression and ideas around the world, and so it is bitterly opposed by every villain, brute, tyrant, and control freak, who will not rest until it is so disabled as to be useless.

Since their very zeitgeist is wrapped up in what they are, like Inspector Javert, they can either destroy the Internet or commit suicide. They choose the former.

Well, it was fun while it lasted.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2010-02-28 10:12  

#3  I guess the internet has routed around this kind of damage before. It's no surprise that Obama's crew is behind this (complete with tin ear) and not those evil fascists who worked for Booosh.
Posted by: Free Radical   2010-02-28 07:12  

#2  This makes perfect sense. They have ruined the rest of the economy. They have sunk their fingers into every other aspect of our lives, it makes sense they would want to screw up the Internet, too.
Posted by: crosspatch   2010-02-28 01:34  

#1   i am sure this admin would never abuse this or misuse it's power to bully outlets that refuse to tow the line on their agenda.... not
Posted by: abu do you love   2010-02-28 00:15  

00:00