You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Liberalism, atheism, male sexual exclusivity linked to IQ
2010-02-28
(CNN) -- Political, religious and sexual behaviors may be reflections of intelligence, a new study finds.

Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs. This applied also to sexual exclusivity in men, but not in women. The findings will be published in the March 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly.

The IQ differences, while statistically significant, are not stunning -- on the order of 6 to 11 points --
As I recall, the test as normally done has an error range of +10 points, so that would just about be within test error...
and the data should not be used to stereotype or make assumptions about people, experts say. But they show how certain patterns of identifying with particular ideologies develop, and how some people's behaviors come to be.

The reasoning is that sexual exclusivity in men, liberalism and atheism all go against what would be expected given humans' evolutionary past. In other words, none of these traits would have benefited our early human ancestors, but higher intelligence may be associated with them.

"The adoption of some evolutionarily novel ideas makes some sense in terms of moving the species forward," said George Washington University leadership professor James Bailey,
Leadership professor? Is that a new field?
who was not involved in the study. "It also makes perfect sense that more intelligent people -- people with, sort of, more intellectual firepower -- are likely to be the ones to do that."
Sadly, higher intelligence too often enables one to arrive at the wrong conclusion more quickly, rather than guaranteeing one arrives at the correct one.
Posted by:Fred

#15  What's important is the age distirbution

The study looked at a large sample from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), which began with adolescents in grades 7-12 in the United States during the 1994-95 school year. The participants were interviewed as 18- to 28-year-olds from 2001 to 2002. The study also looked at the General Social Survey, another cross-national data collection source.

Anyone not a liberal at 20 is without a heart and anyone not a conservative at 40 is without a brain. Oh, and the 20 year olds think they're immortal.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-02-28 17:03  

#14  The flaw (if you like) in this study is self identified liberal/conservative.

I'd say I was 'liberal', even though by most peoples standards I'm (very) right wing on economic issues and things like the WoT. I'm liberal on personal freedom issues.

I'd also like to see the IQ distribution. Averages can be very misleading. For example the average person has one testicle and one breast.
Posted by: phil_b   2010-02-28 16:57  

#13  The rather obvious link between "Liberalism" and narcissism is the study to go for.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2010-02-28 15:31  

#12  Nice quote there, Bobby. It seems that Dr Satoshi is a feminist in the mode of Keith Olbermann. I'm sure he gets a lot of chix with that attitude...

Here's Andrew Klavan's take on liberals, for the counterargument...
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2010-02-28 12:45  

#11  Thats funny, cuz 9/10 liberal athiest homosexuals I came across were more concerned about finding ironic t-shirts and trendy coffee bars, then say...the implications of publishing foux studies which justify the intellectual difficiencies of those opposed to the self centered hubristic implications of naming dissenters incapable of rational thought.
.
..wait a second this sounds familiar.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2010-02-28 12:45  

#10  This great nation was not built on Athiest homosexual liberial ideals.

But it may be destroyed by them....
Posted by: CrazyFool   2010-02-28 12:26  

#9  This should come as no suprise. When you survey NYC, Berkley, Hollywood, and Miami, you will find most of the smart conservative God fearing Americans have left. Leaving the Hispanic immagrants, who are mostly conservative left for the survey. This is just more bullshit from people who think they are better that the rest.

This great nation was not built on Athiest homosexual liberial ideals. This great nation was built on God fearing Conservative principles.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2010-02-28 11:30  

#8  Satoshi Kanazawa, PhD (born November 16, 1962) is an evolutionary psychologist at the London School of Economics. His research uses evolutionary psychology to analyze social sciences such as sociology, economics, and anthropology.[1] In 2003, in an article in the Journal of Research in Personality, he showed that scientists generally made their biggest discovery before their mid-30s, and compared this productivity curve to that of criminals.[2]
Loon.
Commenting on the War on Terror, Kanazawa claimed that "there is one resource that our enemies have in abundance but we donÂ’t: hate. Hatred of enemies has always been a proximate emotional motive for war throughout human evolutionary history." He then offers the following thought experiment: "Imagine that, on September 11, 2001, when the Twin Towers came down, the President of the United States was not George W. Bush, but Ann Coulter. What would have happened then? On September 12, President Coulter would have ordered the US military forces to drop 35 nuclear bombs throughout the Middle East, killing all of our actual and potential enemy combatants, and their wives and children. On September 13, the war would have been over and won, without a single American life lost. Yes, we need a woman in the White House, but not the one whoÂ’s running (Hillary Clinton, ed.)".[
Lunatic.
Posted by: Bobby   2010-02-28 11:24  

#7  "I am too smarter than you! Nyah! Nyah! Nyah!"
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839   2010-02-28 10:40  

#6  I'd say it's more correlated to low testosterone.
Posted by: ed   2010-02-28 07:20  

#5  Read the article if you wish to be confronted with shocking academic blindness. Amongst other howlers, it claims that religion does not help people survive, it helps them to 'be paranoid.'

As has been discussed here, liberalism (and atheism to a lesser extent) is shallow social signaling for the 'smarty-pants' set. The study didn't ask about predilections to authoritarianism or tyranny, which is a big moral problem in those circles, IMO.
Posted by: Free Radical   2010-02-28 06:51  

#4  Why Are Liberals in a Slump? For One Thing, They Have Fewer Kids

Posted by: Anguth Barnsmell2985   2010-02-28 06:20  

#3  Riiiiiiight. Let me guess, the author of this "study" happens to be liberal, atheistic and IHHO has a high IQ?
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2010-02-28 05:01  

#2  Mee no get it.
Posted by: gorb   2010-02-28 03:58  

#1  If you're credulous enough to believe this cr@p, you must be a Liberal.
Posted by: Bulldog   2010-02-28 03:00  

00:00