You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
A water war out of thin air
2010-04-02
It is often difficult to make sense of words uttered in anger. And Pakistan is an angry country. It has now whipped up another dispute with India out of thin air. It has alleged that India is “stealing' its river waters. It has alleged that New Delhi is violating the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 that governs the use of river waters by the two countries.

Pakistan's allegations, at the moment, centre on the Nimmo-Bazgo and Chutak hydroelectric power projects over the Indus river in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). The allegation is that by going ahead with these projects, India is trying to divert river waters that rightly belong to Pakistan.

A meeting earlier this week between the Indus water commissioners of the two countries to discuss the “dispute' in Lahore remained inconclusive. It had to, for keeping matters inconclusive is Pakistan's aim.

The facts are simple. By the 1960 treaty, Pakistan is allowed unfettered use of Indus, Chenab and Jhelum rivers. India cannot store any water from these rivers or stop them from flowing to Pakistan. India can construct hydroelectric power projects over these rivers, but has to allow a free flow of water. It can go in for “pondage', i.e., water being held behind a dam for a short time (say, as it flows into turbines to generate electricity) but even this is limited. This is very different from storing this water, say, for major irrigation projects. In addition, India must share designs of these projects, water flow data and a host of other information with Islamabad.

Since 1960, India has executed the terms of the treaty in letter and spirit. But now, out of nowhere, the civilian government in Islamabad has created a new issue. Its effort is to ensure that these projects never take off. Pakistan has a good track record of derailing such projects in the past. The Wullar Barrage project (in J&K) has been stalled for two decades now. The Baglihar project (again in J&K) could proceed only because the government of India showed the will to move ahead.

Islamabad's complaint is a red herring, a device used to mobilize public opinion against India to deflect attention from serious inequities in water sharing between different provinces of Pakistan. It's an old trick to keep India on the defensive. There is no reason to be defensive. A blunt response will serve our interests well.
Posted by:john frum

#4  PAKISTANI DEFENCE FORUM > PAKISTANI MINSTER LETS WATER SECRET OUT [INDJUH is NOT stealing water somuch as PAK is WASTING IT].

* OTOH SAME > [India Water Treaty CHairman]INDIA HAS 52 PROJECTS TO INCREASE CONTROL OF PAKISTAN'S WATER. ALso calims that INDIA is receiving international Govts-Corpors, Pruvate Assistance for approxi 17 of same. Previous 130-plus atempts or rounds at INDO-PAK water negotiations have failed = come to naught.

SAME > WATER WOES MAY TURN PAKISTAN INTO ANOTHER SOMALIA OR ETHIOPIA?

* SAME > [Major general TARIQ KHAN] PAKISTAN TRIBAL ZONE [FATA] NEEDS US$1.0BILYUHN TO PREVENT IT FROM BECOMING AN ALQAEDA, TALIBAN BASE.

- FIVE OF SEVEN FATA DISTRICTS NOW UNDER FULL GOVT. CONTROL, +
- EXTREMISTS/MILITANTS may be forcibly ousted by PAk Govt-Army from FATA = Tribal Zones in about TWO MONTHS?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-04-02 20:50  

#3  Under the Indus Waters Treaty, Pakistan gets 4 times the amount of water from these rivers than India gets. No other upper riparian state in the world has surrendered its right to use the water from 3 entire rivers, leaving all for the lower riparian.
Pakistan may well regret its noises regarding the treaty. A renegotiation will not be as favorable to Pakistan. Nehru is long dead.
Posted by: john frum   2010-04-02 16:05  

#2  "Next we'll have the Islamists claiming that infidels are breathing too much."

They basically already are.
Posted by: Keeney   2010-04-02 13:36  

#1  First the Islamists wanted the US out of the Saudi Islamic Apartheid Republic, then it was the Palestinian issue, then it was the building of houses in Jerusalem, now this. Next we'll have the Islamists claiming that infidels are breathing too much.
Posted by: HammerHead   2010-04-02 10:34  

00:00