You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Women march topless in Portland without incident
2010-04-06
About two dozen women marched topless from Longfellow Square to Tommy's Park this afternoon in an effort to erase what they see as a double standard on male and female nudity.
Yeah, everyone was seeing double that day.
The women, preceded and followed by several hundred boisterous and mostly male onlookers, many of them carrying cameras, stayed on the sidewalk because they hadn't obtained a demonstration permit to walk in the street. About a thousand people gathered as the march passed through Monument Square, a mix of demonstrators, supporters, onlookers and those just out enjoying a warm and sunny early-spring day.
Watching the first annual Tit Parade.
After the marchers reached Tommy's Park in the Old Port, some turned around and walked back to Longfellow Square, but most stayed and mingled in the park. Some happily posed for pictures.
And sold autographed jump-ropes.
Police said there were no incidents and no arrests – nudity is illegal in Maine only if genitals are displayed.
Hmm, maybe they could hold the next one in Alaska . . . .
Ty McDowell, who organized the march, said she was "enraged" by the turnout of men attracted to the demonstration. The purpose, she said, was for society to have the same reaction to a woman walking around topless as it does to men without shirts on.
Your cause is doomed to failure because men don't have tits, Ty. But you're welcome to keep trying.
However, McDowell said she plans to organize similar demonstrations in the future and said she would be more "aggressive" in discouraging oglers.
What a bunch of boobs.
Posted by:gorb

#19  What's the opposite of Viagra? That's what we got here.

Rearrange v-i-a-g-r-a and you get gravi[t]a. A force exerting downward.
Posted by: lex   2010-04-06 16:08  

#18  What's the opposite of Viagra? That's what we got here.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-04-06 16:02  

#17  I had to laugh at the guy wearing a box with pink balloons glued on the front of it. And yeah, most of those gals looked like refugees from a gourd festival.
Posted by: Jefferson   2010-04-06 15:43  

#16  the funny thing is the laser hair removal ad that pops up with this article>>>>>
Posted by: chris   2010-04-06 15:19  

#15  Reminds of the Breasts Not Bombs protest in (where else?) Berkeley a few years ago. The event came about 30 years too late for most of the participants and was yet another example of the triumph of time and gravity over politics.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2010-04-06 14:57  

#14  BFD. Big freakin deal. So its like the sixties all over again. A war is being waged and hippies are jockeying for attention with their headlights on.
Posted by: Thrurt Barnsmell7160   2010-04-06 14:42  

#13  In Maine, going topless is not against the law. Only the exposing of gentiles is against the law.

Also in Portland, Maine: The heart of coastal nutty liberal land, they are considering letting NON-citizens vote in local city elections!
Posted by: Omolush de Medici1656   2010-04-06 14:33  

#12  are you drunk or blind I didn't make it a minute into that video after seeing the orange head thing with tha knee knockers
Posted by: chris   2010-04-06 12:26  

#11   Yes, there's video. And, yes, it's NSFW.
Actually, it will not burn out your corneas.
And, yes, ladies, men are pigs...
Posted by: tu3031   2010-04-06 12:02  

#10  Besoeker you still staying in GA?I was sitting in traffic in north GA on A BRIDGE THE OTHER DAY AND CAUGHT MYSELF WORRYING ABOUT THE WEIGHT LIMIT OF SAID BRIDGE.
Posted by: chris   2010-04-06 11:54  

#9  So these women don't get arrested and put on the sexual offender list? I heard about a young guy who "streaked" as a prank and that did happen to him. I guess there wasn't anyone complaining in Portland.

What were they protesting again? Oh double standard. A kind of national silliness.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-04-06 11:02  

#8  men who go topless, Mike, are rarely a welcome sight either. But they do reveal some pretty impressive boobies at the beach and that beer belly is a real turn-on.
Posted by: Swanimote   2010-04-06 10:04  

#7  Hokay....have a topless protest, go out of your way to get attention for the event, and then get mad when some guy looks at your...um....talking points.

Yeah, that makes a helluva lot of sense, Ty.
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2010-04-06 09:54  

#6  Besoker, better put some red-eye gravy on that.
Posted by: Beavis   2010-04-06 09:44  

#5  I live in an area heavily populated with overweight, grits and streak O'lean eating pensioners. Hopefully, what goes on in Maine, stays in Maine.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-04-06 09:30  

#4  I have no issue with this, or anyone going completely buck naked either. Just as long as there are dedicated "clothing optional" areas. Because when I'm eating lunch out in a park the last thing I want to see is a bunch of ugly fucks running around naked. You want to just be in your skivies, fine. Do it in the proper district and area, not where it ruins my BLT lunch.
Posted by: DarthVader   2010-04-06 09:20  

#3  in the immortal words of Selma Bouvier: "Damn that back fat"
Posted by: Frank G   2010-04-06 09:06  

#2  Your cause is doomed to failure because men don't have tits, Ty.

My guess is that Ty doesn't seem have any either.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2010-04-06 08:48  

#1  The problem with this is one of set theory. Very few members of the set of "women who look good topless" are also members of the set of "women who march in topless protests." On the other, er, hand, the members of the set of "women who march in topless protests" are almost always also members of the set of "women who should not go topless under any circumstances because--AIEEE! MY EYES! MY EYES!"
Posted by: Mike   2010-04-06 08:25  

00:00