You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Obama Cancels Kennedy's Dream
2010-04-16
In which Gizmodo takes B.O. to task for ditching the space program, in effect turning Americans into the incurious herd animals he thinks we should be.

My question is: if Kennedy's vision was to put a man on the moon in ten years working from the technological base that was then in place, why can't we do it in a year and at less cost using the technology we have now?
Posted by:Fred

#8  You know if we could put a man on the moon, why can't we put a... uh....uh...oh yeah.
Posted by: lord garth   2010-04-16 16:53  

#7  The OTHER Kennedy, the one the Cubans got the Chicago mob to shoot for them.

Teddy's dream of wrecking the US economy is right on track.
Posted by: mojo   2010-04-16 16:36  

#6  The CIA's payroll is hidden in NASA's budget in addition to all the cross technology used by the military and NSA. Obama isn't ditching the space program but gutting defense and looking like he's making tough fiscal cuts.

You get the idea that was the intent; to gut defense.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-04-16 09:39  

#5  Obama has canceled a lot of dreams people had.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-04-16 09:36  

#4  The CIA's payroll is hidden in NASA's budget in addition to all the cross technology used by the military and NSA. Obama isn't ditching the space program but gutting defense and looking like he's making tough fiscal cuts.
Posted by: Lumpy Elmoluck5091   2010-04-16 09:33  

#3  Forget about the frigging moon and Mars. How about concentrating on 'Peoria' and private sector jobs for a while.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-04-16 08:15  

#2  Extortion funded Manned Space Programs are a HUMUNGOUS misallocation of taxpayers money.

The only thing that putting a man on the moon proved was that Capitalism can afford a parasitic state more comfortably than Marxism.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2010-04-16 07:42  

#1  Fred,

The problem with NASA goes back to the late 60s and early 70s as they were winding down from Apollo. Their focus shifted from exploration and research to becoming a welfare program for the aerospace industry. They have to re-invent the wheel every time they want to do something, because otherwise nobody makes any money.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2010-04-16 06:17  

00:00