You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
S.Korea Warns North Role in Sinking of Ship Could Harm Nuclear Talks
2010-04-21
It's more accurately described as 'an act of war', but apparently the ROK leadership had their spines removed without our knowing about it ...
South Korea says multinational talks meant to get rid of Pyongyang's nuclear weapons programs would be unlikely to resume if evidence points to a North Korean role in the sinking of a South Korean navy ship.

Foreign Minister Yu Myung-hwan dismissed a media report Tuesday that North Korea may be preparing its third nuclear weapons test. However, he told reporters if evidence emerges linking the North to last month's sinking of a navy corvette, it would be difficult to resume six-nation nuclear talks. He says from a common sense view, it will be hard to have the six-party talks in the foreseeable future if evidence confirms North Korea's involvement in the sinking.

Forty-six South Korean sailors were killed after an explosion tore their ship in half and sank it. It was patrolling west of the Korean peninsula in one of the most dangerous sea regions of the world. North Korea rejects a United Nations-mandated maritime border in the area, and the two Koreas have clashed three times there since 1999.

Investigators say the ship was almost certainly damaged by an external explosion. However, North Korea has denied widespread speculation it attacked the vessel.

South Korea says it will go to the United Nations Security Council as part of an international response if it proves North Korea had a role in the sinking. Putting the six-nation nuclear talks on hold may be part of that strategy.

However, Yang Moo-jin, a scholar at Seoul's University of North Korean Studies, says the foreign minister's warning about the nuclear talks should be taken in context. He says what is most important is to balance the foreign minister's comments with other remarks by President Lee Myung-bak, who said that there still is no clear evidence of any North Korean involvement in the sinking.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  OOOPSIES, forgot WMF > RUSSIA RESHAPES ITS AIR FORCE TO DEFEAT THE "CHINA THREAT" TO ITS FAR EAST.

* SAME > RETURN FORM RUSSIA: THE TRUTH OF THE QUALITY-OF-LIFE SITUATION IN CHINA VERSUS RUSSIA.

ARTIC NUTSHELL > RUSSIA = AMER'S BANKRUPT, JOBLESS, DYING, RISING MUSLIM-POPUL "DETROIT" SAVED ARMED WID NUKES???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-04-21 22:54  

#4  Again, NET POSTERS > DID CHINA KNOW OR ORDER THE ATTACK??? A quiet or subtle REGIONAL NAVAL-AIR-MISSLE BUILDUP = ARSM RACE has been occurring in NORTHEAST ASIA for a couple of years now, repor espec as per ARMED SUBMARINES + SEA OF JAPAN.

E.g. NEWS [old] > THE SEA OF JAPAN IS GETTING CROWDED [wid Warships].

* WMF > CHINA BACK AGAIN IN THE JAPANESE GARDEN: JAPAN ORDERS EXPANSION OF YONAGUNI ISLAND MILITARY MISSION AND CHINA-CENTRIC MIL ANALYSIS/INTEL CAPABILITIES IN WAKE OF CHINESE NAVAL MOVEMENT OFF OKINAWA.

* SAME > THE DRAGON IS AWAKE AND ROARING/
COMING:OPERATION OF CHINA'S NORTH CHINA SEAS FLEET OFF JAPAN WILL STIR ACTION, DEFENSE AGZ CHINA THROUGHOUT THE FIRST-ISLAND CHAIN.

* SAME > SIX-PART SUMMARY ON THE POST-WW2 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JAPAN AND RUSSIA IN THE KURILES. ANALYSIS OF RUSSO-JAPANESE MIL STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES IN POTENTIAL MIL CONFLICT OVER THE KURILES. JAPANESE DESIRE FOR MILPOL INFLUENCE, SOVEREIGNTY OVER SAKHALIN AND OTHER ISLANDS HELD BY RUSSIA.

Lest we fergit, to defeat the US = US Navy Carrier BGS in a SINO-US WAR OER TAIWAN, CHIN plans to PREEMPTIVELY NUKE JAPAN IFF NEED BE, + GUAM + HAWAII + ALASKA/WEST ALCAN, LONG BEFORE US RELIEF FORCES CAN ARRIVE IN-THEATER.

CHIN VIEW > SAKHALIN + KURILES = "CAM RANH BAY/SEA OF VIETNAM" IN NORTHEAST ASIA = IFF CHINA IS NOT ALLOWED ACCESS/USE RIGHTS TO SAME, NO ONE CAN.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-04-21 22:16  

#3  The SK media is polluted with attacks on alleged "US destabilization" moves. A majority of SK's want their "security" based on non-binding declarations of intent, by the NKs. In that context, the NK dictators have a free hand to execute piecemeal terror. Wherever the enemy pushes, our "allies" bend.
Posted by: Blackbeard Phomoling4117   2010-04-21 17:23  

#2  Would be interesting if someone like , say china decided it was a good idea to see how far they can push South Korea in to a serious , proper, no backing down face off/war with Norks. Really a win win situation of China .
Posted by: Oscar   2010-04-21 09:20  

#1  "a North Korean role"? You mean that they planned the whole thing and launched a premeditated act of war?
Posted by: gromky   2010-04-21 09:04  

00:00