Submit your comments on this article | |
Good morning | |
2010-04-21 | |
Posted by:Fred |
#23 I miss the pics. I see no issue with the clean ones with the racier stuff linked. |
Posted by: OldSpook 2010-04-21 23:34 |
#22 I think it's delightful when a bunch of anarchists gather for a common purpose. Thanks GB, for your charity. Sorry you caught grief. |
Posted by: Skidmark 2010-04-21 21:37 |
#21 Roman Gladiaphers! Why can we not have pics of half-clad er less GLADIAPHERS? |
Posted by: B. Franks 2010-04-21 20:17 |
#20 I don't really care one way or the other, so count my vote whichever way you want to. I've no objections to the pictures of pretty women; they just don't do anything for me. I generally don't look at them, though I might page through looking for funny comments on the RD-S&T-P's headlines. I do love the older pictures on the front page (1920's?). |
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2010-04-21 19:28 |
#19 I want my GB pics back. :( |
Posted by: 49 Pan 2010-04-21 18:47 |
#18 If it comes to a vote, put me down for bringing back the babes. |
Posted by: tu3031 2010-04-21 18:45 |
#17 I thought this was an intelligent site (and still do for the most part). A less than one percent response dictates policy? Rantburg admin, you've gone down a notch. Shame on you for being so very, very, P.C.. |
Posted by: Flapper Scourge of the Algonquins4926 2010-04-21 18:20 |
#16 *sigh* I just mentioned that some of the front pics were, perhaps, not quite safe for work. Definitely didn't want them to go away :(. Now what am I going to use to kick-start the ole heart in the morning? |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2010-04-21 17:53 |
#15 Not even in the sinktrap. :) it will be missed. thanks for the mammaries GB |
Posted by: abu do you love 2010-04-21 17:24 |
#14 gorb, you're right. I don't know know why that decision was made or who made it. As a dude still in his 30s I enjoyed the pics of the ladies from the 1930s-1960s - a different type of class for sure. (not that I didn't like the women of today as well :) |
Posted by: Broadhead6 2010-04-21 16:30 |
#13 It was my first stop every morning. Thanks for all GB |
Posted by: Beavis 2010-04-21 14:13 |
#12 RANTBURG and GB's post was my first stop every morning. I'll still make this my first stop but the anticipation will have gone from boil to simmer. GB, thanks for the memories. |
Posted by: Total War 2010-04-21 14:02 |
#11 Yeah, I know. But even though no decision was made and GB toned down his post voluntarily, it still disappeared with no explanation. |
Posted by: gorb 2010-04-21 14:02 |
#10 gorb, check out the threadline on this from yesterday...I looked forward to the good morning segment of rantburg everyday - some thought it was too racy. |
Posted by: Broadhead6 2010-04-21 13:44 |
#9 I'd like to know what's up with that. Is RB taking a different direction, or is it personal? |
Posted by: gorb 2010-04-21 13:08 |
#8 86ed |
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC 2010-04-21 12:48 |
#7 Where did GB's post go? |
Posted by: gorb 2010-04-21 11:13 |
#6 hah! Here in So Cal we schedule 3.3's just to stir our cocktails! |
Posted by: Frank G 2010-04-21 11:00 |
#5 I wondered about that JohnQ. My oldest daughter lives in Maryville and I emailed her but havn't gotten a response. |
Posted by: Deacon Blues 2010-04-21 10:10 |
#4 Our small earthquake (3.3) came and went in East Tennessee and it just rattled a few dishes. I have to conclude, it is not GolfBravos scantily clad babes behind the pictures that caused the problem. We are all safe from promiscuous women. It is safe to continue the fine work GB. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2010-04-21 10:00 |
#3 That explains a lot about the popularity of Jersey Shore. |
Posted by: Mike 2010-04-21 06:36 |
#2 Robin Meade's got a tat! |
Posted by: gorb 2010-04-21 04:53 |
#1 And may the babes of Joisey cause Ayman al Zawahiri to break into a hot lather that makes him wonder if Allan is gonna strike him dead. Beats the hell out of a goat, don't it, Knothead? |
Posted by: Abu Uluque 2010-04-21 00:03 |