| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Lurid Crime Tales- |
| Navy Looks for New Ways to Fight Pirates |
| 2010-04-22 |
| The U.S. Navy will be unable to continue long-term operations against pirates off the coast of Somalia, and it's looking for other ways to solve the growing problem, according to a top admiral. As Somali pirates continue to find attacking cargo ships in the West Indian Ocean profitable, they have become more and more aggressive, forcing the international community to send naval ships from more than a dozen countries to help patrol the vast waters off Somalia. But the patrols are expensive and deprive the global fleet of precious resources, and they can't continue such costly operations, says Adm. Mark Fitzgerald, the top naval commander in Europe and Africa. "I don't think we can sustain the level of operation we've got down there forever," said Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald did not indicate the Navy would abandon the mission any time soon. Instead, his remarks suggest that the answer to piracy may lie elsewhere --- especially if it becomes a more violent activity. He says the shipping industry should ensure it is doing everything to deter attacks, including hiring armed security guards, as well as taking other nonlethal actions to thwart pirates. "The maritime industry has got to make a decision about how seriously they want to take this on," he said, in a roundtable discussion with reporters at the Pentagon this week. About 40 naval vessels patrol those waters at any one time, including as many as 10 U.S. Navy ships. Those patrols have been effective. The U.S. Navy's presence alone has thwarted several attacks, including one Friday in which a helicopter from the destroyer Farragut scared off an attack from a pirate skiff. Last week, the USS Ashland, a Navy amphibious ship, received small-arms fire from a pirate skiff. When the ship returned fire and the skiff caught fire, the pirates jumped into the water and Navy personnel rescued them. Over the past 12 days, the Navy has apprehended 21 suspected pirates. The industry has resisted hiring security guards in part out of fear of escalating the violence on the high seas. There are also legal issues with having weapons aboard ships that port in various countries, industry officials have said. The Maersk Alabama, a U.S.-flagged ship, was pirated twice, including once last year when its captain was held until the pirates were killed by U.S. military sharpshooters. The second time it was attacked, it had armed security guards aboard who thwarted the attack. But those guards were there because the U.S. government contracts with Maersk Line to ship military supplies to the war zone. "Our company policy is we don't want weapons on board our vessels, and we don't allow them except in instances where governments or authorities mandate us to do so," says Kevin Speers, a spokesman for Maersk Line, Limited. He noted that various carriers, including his own, have taken a number of nonlethal measures to avoid attack. Legal issues with captured pirates From the U.S. Navy's point of view, there are long-term legal questions about what to do with captured pirates. Typically, they are low-level operators from Somalia who provide little in the way of useful intelligence for addressing a problem that costs the shipping industry millions of dollars a year. Fitzgerald says the solution is for the U.S. to go after the source of piracy. While he didn't rule out using military force, he said following the money might be a good place to start. Kenyan officials have told Fitzgerald that money from Somalia is being used to buy up high-end real estate there and in Ethiopia with what appears to be the proceeds from piracy. Indeed, the U.S. has begun to get serious about going after money earned by pirates. President Obama on Tuesday gave Treasury officials additional powers to sanction or freeze assets of individuals involved in piracy, the Associated Press reported. According to the executive order signed by Obama, the justification for the broader powers is U.S. national security. "The deterioration of the security situation and the persistence of violence in Somalia, and acts of piracy and armed robbery at sea off the coast of Somalia, constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States," writes Obama in his executive order. |
| Posted by:Sherry |
| #15 I was actually thinking of the navy boats, you're a little more adventurous than me, I guess. |
| Posted by: bigjim-CA 2010-04-22 23:39 |
| #14 Bigjim, NOT a good idea on oil carriers. Trust me on this one. |
| Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2010-04-22 20:59 |
| #13 Two words, Flame throwers. |
| Posted by: bigjim-CA 2010-04-22 20:03 |
| #12 Large barrels of hungry scorpions broken open on the decks of the piarate scows... |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2010-04-22 19:47 |
| #11 The solution in the past to organized piracy has always been to destroy the land base. Stephen Decatur was an example. Study Mahan. |
| Posted by: No I am the other Beldar 2010-04-22 18:48 |
| #10 Stop subsidizing foreign shipping companies. How many hundreds of millions of dollars is the American taxpayer shelling out to protect foreign shipping? STOP IT. Encourage American shipping (what tiny bit there is shipping free food to those same prates) to go heavily armed and let skyrocketing insurance rates encourage the shipping nations to find an optimum solution. |
| Posted by: ed 2010-04-22 18:46 |
| #9 Patrol with a preditor, sink the boats on sight and relay the SOS to the Somalie coast guard. Ya I know, coast guard has no boats. FMS grant them a 22' bayrunner and a radio. problem solved. |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2010-04-22 17:52 |
| #8 Back to the topic at hand: I'd vote for sinking mother ships and hanging the crew after a drumhead court martial, but that seems to be out of the question these days. Next best option seems to be paying Kenya to try and jail the miscreants for a decade apiece. On a separate tack, those shipping lines that refuse to carry armed guards should be required to pay their share of the cost of patrolling the region. Not that it seems likely to ever happen. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2010-04-22 17:14 |
| #7 I'm for a club soda with lime on lotp's tab. See the rest of you at the O Club! (For those who haven't been, the link is in the yellow box in the right hand margin. One needn't be an officer to drink there -- even little suburban housewives and engineers of all sorts are welcome, not to mention lawyers and Indian chiefs from both continents.) |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2010-04-22 17:06 |
| #6 P2k, you're right. So ..... All drinks in the Club are 1 virtual Fred Buck today, balance on my tab. And the first 5 people who belly up to the bar drink a round for free. If you ask AutoBartender really nicely he might bring out the good stuff from the back ... |
| Posted by: lotp 2010-04-22 16:11 |
| #5 There has not been a full round of drinks in the O'Club lately.. You may have stumbled upon part of the problem. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2010-04-22 13:46 |
| #4 There has not been a full round of drinks in the O'Club lately.... so how about.... An ARCLIGHT raid on the Pirate's home port.... That might be a new way to fight??? |
| Posted by: 3dc 2010-04-22 12:48 |
| #3 Try Combat. It has worked before. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2010-04-22 12:25 |
| #2 From the U.S. Navy's point of view, there are long-term legal questions about what to do with captured pirates. And who may I ask, do we have to thank for that wonderful conundrum? |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2010-04-22 12:11 |
| #1 Could I suggest putting your lawyers on board the pirate vessels then blowing them out of the water and sailing away? |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2010-04-22 12:03 |