You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
CIA using smaller missiles in drone attacks
2010-04-27
LAHORE: The US Central Intelligence Agency has started using smaller missiles in its hunt for al Qaeda and other terrorist leaders in Pakistan in hope of minimising civilian casualties, The Washington Post reported on Monday. Citing unnamed current and former officials in the United States and Pakistan, the newspaper said the new technology had resulted in more accurate strikes that have provoked relatively little public outrage.
According to the report, one such missile was used by the CIA last month in Miranshah, the main town of North Waziristan.

The projectile, which was no bigger than a violin case and weighed about 35 pounds, hit a house there and killed a top al Qaeda official and about nine other suspected terrorists, the paper said. The mud-brick house collapsed and the roof of a neighbouring house was damaged, but no one else in the town was hurt, the WP said.
It's the Acme Guided Boulder, mark 3!
Just wait 'til we work up to Bright Pebbles...
The CIA declined to publicly discuss its clandestine operations in Pakistan, and a spokesman would not comment on the kinds of weapons the agency is using, the report said.

But two counterterrorism officials said in interviews that evolving technology and tactics had kept the number of civilian deaths extremely low. The officials, along with other US and Pakistani officials interviewed for the article spoke on the condition of anonymity because the drone campaign is both classified and controversial.

The paper said the agency, using 100-pound Hellfire missiles fired from remotely-controlled Predator aircraft, once targeted Taliban largely in rural settings, but lighter weapons and miniature spy drones have made killings in urban areas more feasible, officials said.

According to an internal CIA accounting described to WP, just over 20 civilians are known to have died in missile strikes since January 2009, in a 15-month period that witnessed more than 70 drone attacks that killed 400 suspected terrorists and insurgents.
400:20? That's a pretty good ratio of bad guys to relative innocents... or innocent relatives, either.
Agency officials said the CIA's figures are based on close surveillance of targeted sites both before and after the missiles hit.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  An MQ-1 Predator can carry three Griffin missiles in place of a single AGM-114 Hellfire

More missiles equals more targets. Happy hunting, O CIA and Air Force angels of death!
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-04-27 17:20  

#4  The projectile, which was no bigger than a violin case and weighed about 35 pounds

Raytheon Griffin
The Griffin missile was developed by Raytheon as a private venture in the 2007/2008 time frame. It is a small tube-launched laser-guided air-to-surface weapon primarily designed as armament for UAVs. An MQ-1 Predator can carry three Griffin missiles in place of a single AGM-114 Hellfire
Posted by: ed   2010-04-27 12:18  

#3  I don't mind the duplication, Besoeker. Given the natural tendency of organizations of all kinds to go off the rails, I think it's valuable to have a covert ops group at the CIA and also to have SOCOMM. And most of the equipment development is dual use.
Posted by: lotp   2010-04-27 09:41  

#2  My question is, why does the CIA need ANY missiles. Follow on...why do we need TWO Air Forces? .......$$$,$$$,$$$,$$$ oh, sorry, reality slipped my mind.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-04-27 07:58  

#1  Lighter/smaller missiles means they can carry more of them, too!
Posted by: gorb   2010-04-27 00:17  

00:00