| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| Bolton: Get ready for a nuclear Iran |
| 2010-05-03 |
| President Obama's likely containment/deterrence strategy will feature security assurances to neighboring countries and promises of American retaliation if Iran uses its nuclear weapons. Unfortunately for this seemingly muscular rhetoric, the simple fact of Iran possessing nuclear weapons would alone dramatically and irreparably alter the Middle East balance of power. Iran does not actually have to use its capabilities to enhance either its regional or global leverage. Nuclear proliferation doesn't stop with Tehran. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and perhaps others will surely seek, and very swiftly, their own nuclear weapons in response. Thus, we would imminently face a multipolar nuclear Middle East waiting only for someone to launch first or transfer weapons to terrorists. Ironically, such an attack might well involve Israel only as an innocent bystander, at least initially. |
| Posted by:Nimble Spemble |
| #1 The MSM-Net + IRAN per se had given many indications oer the years that IRAN is already a NUCSTATE as per seeking or procuring Nuctehcs + NUCENERGY. WHEN MOUD = IRAN SAYS THAT THEY DESIRE + SHOULD BE TO BE A [formal]MEMBER OF THE "NUCLEAR CLUB", WHAT THEY MEAN IS NUCLEAR MILITARY "GREAT POWER" IFF NOT DE FACTO "SUPERPOWER" WID NUCWEAPONS. * 2012 > comes down to IRAN formally declaring it possesses any type of NUCWEAPONS [includ LR WMDS/NBC-CBRNE techs]. * POST-2012 = 2013? > RADICAL ISLAM + MILTERR GROUPS DECLARE THEY POSSESS OR HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO SAME. "ISLAMIST/JIHADIST BOMB " = NUCLEAR MILIT-TERROR becomes GEOPOL REALITY FOR US-WORLD. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2010-05-03 19:17 |