You have commented 338 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Horn
Armed men ambush Darfur peacekeepers, two killed
2010-05-08
KHARTOUM - Armed men ambushed U.N.-African Union peacekeepers in Darfur on Friday, killing two soldiers and seriously injuring three in Sudan's troubled west, the latest in a wave of attacks on the under-equipped force.

“The attackers fled when the convoy returned fire. The attack left two peacekeepers killed in action and three seriously wounded,' the peacekeeping mission known as UNAMID said in a statement.

The peacekeepers were Egyptian, UNAMID said, urging the government to bring the unknown attackers to justice. Some 24 UNAMID soldiers have been killed since the mission was established in January 2008.

Separately Darfur's main rebel group said on Friday it had clashed twice with government troops in the past three days, warning more attacks would mean “all-out war' and the collapse of a fragile peace process. The rebel Justice and Equality Movement said 9t had clashed on May 4 with Sudan's army 18 km (11 miles) south of Darfur's capital el-Fasher and again in West Darfur on May 6.

“There is continuous bombardment by the Sudan government,' said JEM official al-Tahir al-Feki, adding there were also clashes on the ground. “If this continues then it is all-out war,' he added. “If the Sudan government does not stop this may lead to escalation and escalation may make the whole (peace process) collapse."

Sudan's army denied any bombardment or real clashes. “These are terrorist attacks,' said an army spokesman. “They go near to the villages and start shooting to scare the people and make them think it is unsafe...We were just chasing them away.'

Two U.N. sources confirmed a JEM presence south of el-Fasher and one official in the joint U.N.-African Union peacekeeping force said they had received unconfirmed reports of a clash between JEM and the government in the area.

The army said JEM was on the move because of internal divisions. JEM said it had “mobile units' but denied trying to move into new areas of control.
Posted by:Steve White

00:00