You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Bill Clinton linked to Sestak scandal
2010-05-28
Greg Sargeant, WaPo "Plum Line"

Senior White House advisers asked former President Bill Clinton to talk to Joe Sestak about whether he was serious about running for Senate, and to feel out whether he'd be open to other alternatives, according to sources familiar with the situation.

But the White House maintains that the Clinton-Sestak discussions were informal, according to the sources.
"Let me make one thing clear," one source said, wagging his finger. "I--er, I mean he--did not have sexual relations with that candidate, Joe Sestak. I never told anybody to not run, not a single time; never. These allegations are false."
The White House, under pressure to divulge the specifics of its interactions with Sestak, will release a formal statement later today outlining their version of events, including Clinton's involvement....
All we need now is a copy of Leaves of Grass and a special prosecutor.
I've been unable to ascertain precisely what Clinton discussed with Sestak in terms of his future options, but I'm gullible the release of the White House's formal response will clear that up.
Posted by:Mike

#6  I wonder how many cigars were traded for "takin' one for the team" and in what condition they were in....
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2010-05-28 19:39  

#5  Good thing for the WH that Slick Willy was convenient. A marriage of Chicago and Arkansas politics made in "orchestra pit."
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-05-28 14:46  

#4  Just like some still believe Willie was innocent, some will never believe their leaders are guilty.

Some of us will never believe their leaders are not guilty.
Posted by: Bobby   2010-05-28 13:23  

#3  Depends on what your definition of is is.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2010-05-28 12:27  

#2  Won't happen. Bill didn't offer a job, he asked whether Sestak was open to a job. No jury will convict if that's all it is.

It's along the lines of, "Cheez, Joe, if you're that unhappy being a Representative, maybe there's something else in the Government you'd like doing instead?"
Posted by: Steve White   2010-05-28 12:12  

#1  Big question:
Was it Bill's turn to wear the blue dress? and who's "human DNA" is on the fabric?

It would be ironic if he survived impeachment and then went to jail for bribary.
Posted by: Frozen Al   2010-05-28 11:53  

00:00