You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Poll: California voters favor Arizona law
2010-05-31
The Los Angeles Times and the University of Southern California polled registered voters on Arizona's move to make illegal immigration a state crime.

From the Los Angeles Times: "50% of registered voters surveyed said they support the law, which compels police to check the immigration status of those they suspect are in the country illegally, while 43% oppose it… Strong majorities of white voters and those over 50 support the Arizona law, while Latinos and those under 30 are heavily opposed."

The 7% gap is well outside the margin of error.

The gap also shows that every city council in the state that is boycotting Arizona is out of step with the electorate.

The actual wording of the questions in the poll. From the poll PDF:

Q. 51 This law requires police who stop a person to question that person's immigration status if there is "reasonable suspicion" that he or she is in the United States illegally and gives police the power to question anyone they suspect of being in the country illegally. It requires people to produce documents verifying their status if asked, and allows officers to detain anyone who cannot do so. Do you favor or oppose this new law?

Strongly favor 41
Not so strongly favor 8
Not so strongly oppose 7
Strongly oppose 36

Total favor 50
Total oppose 43

Q. 52 Now let me read you some statements that supporters and opponents of the law may make.

Opponents of this law say that we need to do something to address immigration, but this law goes too far and is not consistent with our American values. This law could legitimize racial profiling and encourage some police officers to stop people they suspect of being here illegally just by looking at them — even if they have no evidence whatsoever.

Supporters of the law say that with as many as 15 million illegal immigrants in this country, we need to address immigration now. This law allows police officers to crack down on those violating the law, will reduce the number of illegal immigrants here, deter people from crossing the border illegally, reduce crime, and stop the flow of drugs into our country.

After hearing those two statements, do you favor or oppose this law?

Strongly favor 42
Not so strongly favor 8
Not so strongly oppose 8
Strongly oppose 35

Total favor 50
Total oppose 43
Posted by:tipper

#8  Citizens of Texas Stand with Arizona Citizens as well.
Posted by: wr    2010-05-31 19:54  

#7  LEGAL voters, well duh!
Posted by: Flapper Scourge of the Algonquins4926   2010-05-31 19:17  

#6  Immigration is the issue that tells me whether a politician is crooked or not.

Yup. If politicians favor open borders, amnesty, all kinds of benefits for illegals, and unrestricted illegal immigration, then the they are just pandering to the Hispanics and trolling for votes to stay in power or get re-elected.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-05-31 16:43  

#5  We need to have a line of sight border enforcement. I would rather see my tax dollars go to border control than to all the services and programs given to illegals once here, anchor baby, schooling, prison, medical, housing etc.
I'm starting to get a little excited about our future again, citizens seem to be waking up.
Posted by: Jan   2010-05-31 14:43  

#4  I seriously hope that Missouri adopts the Arizona law or something tougher. I don't really care if Seattle or LA decide to boycott us.
Posted by: Jefferson   2010-05-31 14:35  

#3  Of course we favor the Arizona law and of course our crooked politicians oppose it. All I can hope is that some of these politicians get their asses handed to them in June and November. In the governor's race Meg Whitman has Romney, Rice, Cheney and some clown from the Howard Jarvis organization endorsing her. Her opponent Steve Poizner asks voters if they want a governor who has the same position on illegal immigration as the president of Mexico. Poizner is weak on all kinds of other issues but Í'm voting for him anyway. The big-wig RINOs need to hear this message from the voters: STOP THE INVASION! As far as I'm concerned I'd just as soon have Moonbeam as governor instead of Whitman. They can talk about taxes, jobs, abortion and anything else but IMMIGRATION IS THE ONLY ISSUE THAT MATTERS. We all know that Republicans and Democrats were all in on the home mortgage scandal. They all should have been screaming bloody murder about that as far back as 1995. So what is the difference between them? Obamacare? If Republicans hadn't been so crooked and irresponsible on other issues they would have been able to stop Obamacare. Immigration is the issue that tells me whether a politician is crooked or not. If they hem and haw about it they are crooked. Period.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2010-05-31 14:06  

#2  California voters understand the problems. It is Pelosi, Boxer, and other liberal California polticians who favor such craziness as open borders and unrestricted illegal immigration. Sanctuary cities such as San Francisco make asine statements but sanctuary is always something for someone else to deal with. I remember when New York cleaned up its homeless problems. Many of NYC's homeless ended up in San Francisco--San Francisco residents were not thrilled. We need to clean house of our politicians who basically stupid and not apt to get any better.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-05-31 10:36  

#1  I heard some new yorker, on TV, say in a synical tone "why not let them in, this is America, they work and so what about the drugs, we dont see any of that here."
Posted by: 49 Pan   2010-05-31 09:59  

00:00