You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Minister lets US 'mole' roam MoD
2010-06-06
LIAM FOX, the defence secretary, is facing questions after installing an American aide with links to US intelligence services in the heart of the Ministry of Defence (MoD).

MPs have raised concerns about Luke Coffey, a former US army captain, who has been appointed to a highly sensitive role as Fox's special adviser. He has not yet been given full security clearance.

Coffey set up the London chapter of an American think tank, many of whose members have backgrounds in the CIA and other American military defence intelligence agencies.

Fox, who has strong links with Washington through his Atlantic Bridge charity, has defended Coffey's appointment and dismissed concerns of spying. He has highlighted the importance of the so-called "special relationship" between Britain and America, saying: "It's not as if he is Russian."
American is worse, to some. There have been Russian moles wandering freely through the marble halls of the British government for several generations with very little protest.
A number of MPs have warned that the access to confidential briefings and paperwork Coffey will enjoy as one of Fox's closest aides could create a serious conflict of interest.

There is particular concern about his role in the forthcoming strategic defence review. Central to the review will be Britain's relationship with America and the future of defence procurement programmes. Critics already accuse Fox of being biased towards purchasing cheaper military equipment from America in favour of supplies from the UK defence industry.

Michael Dugher, the Labour MP who once worked as a special adviser in the MoD, said: "This raises serious questions. At a time when the MoD is undertaking a sensitive defence review, vital to British national interests, is it really appropriate to have a foreign national and a former member of the US military employed by the taxpayer as a special adviser to the British secretary of state?

"It will only fuel fears that Liam Fox plans to tear up important contracts with UK-based suppliers -- supporting thousands of British jobs -- in favour of buying 'off the shelf' from the Americans."
This is the real issue, not security.
Coffey has a masters degree in European politics from the London School of Economics. He arrived in Britain in 2006 and began working for Mark Harper, the Tory MP, before applying to work in Fox's office.
The theory of nefarious influence is easy to test then: how did MP Harper vote on the subject?
He runs the London branch of an organisation called Censa (Council for Emerging National Security Affairs), whose mission is to "shape US national security policy" and to "become the premier venue for virtual collaboration in addressing national security affairs and policy renewals". About a quarter of the members listed on its website have a background in intelligence.

Although the special adviser has been issued with a pass giving him access to all areas of the MoD, he has not yet been "defence vetted". Only a handful of special advisers in the most sensitive departments, such as No 10 and the Foreign Office, undergo this process.

It is understood that the security clearance process, which can take several months, has been delayed because of Coffey's nationality. MoD sources say that until he has been cleared he will be working on a restricted computer and will not be allowed into the most confidential meetings.

Since Fox became defence secretary there have been two highly sensitive briefings -- on special forces and Britain's nuclear deterrent -- which Coffey was not allowed to attend.

However, Whitehall insiders say he will still have ready access to highly confidential documents relating to security and commercial contracts.
Posted by:lotp

#5  Not back then, tw, though it's generally seemed to be that way since then.

The War of 1812 is often termed "the Second U.S. Revolution" . More accurately, IMNSHO, it was the first war in support of the U.S. national interest.
Posted by: Pappy   2010-06-06 20:12  

#4  Well said, cheers! Pappy, perhaps Goodluck Smock1954 was stretching in the opposite direction: Britain fighting to free itself from us?
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-06-06 19:24  

#3  I like the sound of this. All I've been hearing lately is how England is going to put our "special relationship" up for review soon. So happy to see cooler heads will (probably) prevail. IMHO the U.S. and England need each other more than ever.
Posted by: cheers   2010-06-06 17:12  

#2  1812- 1815 - 2nd War for Independence

Bit of a stretch, methinks.
Posted by: Pappy   2010-06-06 13:33  

#1  Let's see,

1775 - 1782 - 1st War for Independence

1812 - 1815 - 2nd War for Independence

201* ? - 3rd War for ?

Is "our man" in place ?

/snark
Posted by: Goodluck Smock1954    2010-06-06 09:13  

00:00