You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
US: Sinking of SKorean warship not terrorism
2010-06-29
The Obama administration said Monday that the sinking of a South Korean warship blamed on North Korea was not terrorism, and not enough by itself to put Pyongyang back on a U.S. terror blacklist.
Quite true. Sinking a warship is an act of war, terrorism would be shooting up the passengers on a holiday ferry.
The State Department said the March sinking of the South Korean frigate Cheonan by a reported torpedo from a North Korean submarine was a "provocative action" and a violation of the truce that ended the Korean war.
Truces don't end wars, they temporarily stop the fighting.
But it added that the sinking was the act of one state's military against another and not an act of terrorism. Thus, it is not grounds to put North Korea back on the U.S. "state sponsors of terrorism" list as some in South Korea had wanted, spokesman P.J. Crowley said.
How about the list of "states that war on their neighbors for no acceptable reason"?
The North had been on the terror list but was removed in 2008 amid progress in the now-stalled effort to get it to abandon nuclear weapons.
On the other hand, the presence of North Korean scientists and technicians doing start-up work at the Syrian nuclear site destroyed by the Israelis a few years ago is definitely reason to put North Korea back on the list, however belatedly.
The sinking "was a provocative action but one taken by the military of a state against the military of another state," Crowley told reporters. "That in our view does not constitute and act of international terrorism."

However, he stressed that the administration was continually reviewing North Korean behavior to determine if other factors would lead to its redesignation as a state sponsor of terrorism. "We will not hesitate to take action if we have information that North Korea has repeatedly provided support for acts of terrorism," Crowley said.

An international investigation concluded last month that North Korea torpedoed the vessel near the tense Korean sea border, killing 46 South Korean sailors. North Korea flatly denies the allegation and has warned any punishment would trigger war.

Earlier Monday, North Korea threatened to bolster its nuclear capability in a new -- though unspecified -- way to cope with what it says is a hostile U.S. policy and military threats amid tensions over the sinking.
Posted by:Beavis

#12  *blush* From you that is a high compliment indeed, SteveS dear.
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-06-29 23:40  

#11  How about the list of "states that war on their neighbors for no acceptable reason"?

Heh. You are on a roll today, girl!
Posted by: SteveS   2010-06-29 15:29  

#10  Terrorism? Since when did anyone consider this was an act of terrorism?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2010-06-29 11:36  

#9  Sure is a nice way to thank our ally for fighting by our side in Iraq.
Posted by: GOP in 2012   2010-06-29 10:45  

#8  maybe NKor is on double secret probation
Posted by: lord garth   2010-06-29 10:04  

#7  Yacka-yacka. Blame-blame. Weasel-weasel.

We've all seen this play act out before.

Still doesn't change the fact that 43 sailors are dead and nothing will get done.
Posted by: DarthVader   2010-06-29 09:27  

#6  Maybe this was just a man caused disaster.
Posted by: Muggsy Glink   2010-06-29 08:02  

#5  Ummm, Abu, A slight correction.
"Unless Obama finds a way to apologise for it."
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2010-06-29 02:15  

#4  "We will not hesitate to take action if we have information that North Korea has repeatedly provided support for acts of terrorism,(unless we can find a way to weasel out of doing so)"

Fixed it.
Posted by: abu do you love   2010-06-29 02:11  

#3  NO, It's an act of WAR, and the "Armistice" Just ended.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2010-06-29 02:09  

#2  OTOH, POTUS BAMMER > has repor demanded that CHINA formally acknowledge NORTH KOREA as the Agressor in attacking the CHEONAN.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-06-29 01:16  

#1  Uh, uh, D*** NG IT, CLEARLY ITS A DE FACTO OF WAR BY A SOVEREIGN STATE AGZ ANOTHER WHICH THE US UNFORTUNATELY CAN'T ACT UPON BECUZ ITS NOT DEFINED AS "TERROR" HENCE NOT THE US TERROR BLACKLIST???

Uh, uh, Okay-y-y......
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-06-29 01:13  

00:00