You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Democrats are now the party of perceived privilege, and GOP is the party of the people
2010-08-01
by JOAN VENNOCHI
... writing in the Bahston Ferfawdsake Globe...
DEMOCRAT John I was in Vietnam, you know Kerry sets sail in a $7 million yacht built in New Zealand. Republican Scott Downtown Scotty Brown hits the campaign trail in a GMC pickup truck with 200,000 miles on it.

From Newport, R.I., -- where Kerry's "Isabel'' was berthed before heading to Nantucket -- to Rhinebeck, N.Y. -- where Chelsea Investment Bankerette Clinton will marry in a mansion modeled after Versailles -- today's Democrats are looking more like Louis XVI than Tip O'Neill.

Kick in the First Family's vacation plans for Martha's Vineyard, and there's a real air of Marie Antoinette & Co. retreating to idyllic gardens, while Fox News whips up revolutionary flames. The ethics charges against Representative Charlie (Yez got nuttin' on me, coppers!) Rangel of New York are added foie gras.

In 2008, Republican John Maverick McCain
... the former foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution...
was the presidential candidate with so many houses, he lost count. Barack B.O. Obama was the guy with only one somewhat luxurious home. Today, President Obama presides over a party of perceived privilege, while Republicans accessorize themselves as the party of the people.

Brown accessorized brilliantly during last January's Senate race in Massachusetts. He's not mega-rich like Kerry, yet comfortable enough, with five properties and a horse his daughter co-owned for a time with a race track owner. But Brown's humble pickup truck and barn jacket remain the enduring symbols of his upstart campaign to win the seat held for decades by the late Teddy The Lion of Chappaquiddick Kennedy.

Kennedy was a rich and powerful Democrat who kept a connection to the people in a way that Brown and millionaire Sarah Mama Grizzly Palin understand.
Palin was a millionaire before she quit as governor of Alaska?
Brown was a millionaire before he was elected to the Senate?
But some Democrats just don't get it, from Governor Deval (Whoa! Nice drapes!) Patrick's fancy drapes and Cadillac to House Speaker Nancy (San Fran Nan) Pelosi's Armani suits and taxpayer-funded military jet.

It isn't about having a lot of money. It's about making people feel you are rubbing your money in their faces, while draining their modest assets for sketchy government programs funded by taxes you don't want to pay.

Republican Mitt Romney is worth more than $200 million, with enough cushion to invest $35 million in his 2008 presidential bid. His real estate holdings include a $12 million mansion in La Jolla, Calif., that was once owned by actor Cliff Robertson, and a lakefront spread in New Hampshire. But for all of Romney's grandiose aspirations and political flip-flops, he is wise enough to avoid grandiose mistakes of excessive, public consumption.

Before his marriage to Teresa Heinz, Kerry was living on his Senate salary and a trust fund worth no more than $100,000. Now he is ranked as the wealthiest member of Congress, with assets of at least $231 million. The Kerry family has five houses, a jet called the "Flying Squirrel'' and a legacy that includes paying to move a fire hydrant from in front of their Beacon Hill home to free up parking space. Now, Kerry's legacy also includes the Newport-berthed yacht and the impression that he was trying to duck Massachusetts taxes.

This might all be empty, frivolous symbolism, except that in politics, perception matters. In this case, the perception fueled by the Kerry yacht fiasco hurts the Democratic agenda.

If the little guy doesn't trust the Democrats, that helps the GOP -- for now.
Ahah. Now we get to the meat of it...
While Republicans drape themselves in middle class values, they are sticking it to the middle class.
... by agitating for tax cuts and competitiveness and individual liberty...
It's all in the effort to deny Obama and the Democrats any positive political message.
Damn them. It's an insidious plot upon the poor Dems. There is no substance. All is perception...
Last week, Senate Republicans rejected a bill to aid small business with expanded loan programs and tax breaks.
That was after the Dems spent all the money that could have covered it...
Before that, Republicans tried to block extension of employment benefits and financial regulatory reforms, which finally passed with minimal help from the GOP.
The "financial regulatory reforms" are so deeply flawed they'll be gnawing the national backside for generations.
These just-say-no tactics can catch up with Republicans -- maybe not in time for midterm elections, but perhaps in time for 2012.
Some of us are hoping they're the opening shots in the new American revolution.
If you watch what Brown does, not what he wears or drives, it's clear that he gets it. He's walking a line that he hopes leads to reelection. It means he can't vote against every Democratic policy aimed at helping ordinary voters. His vote against extending unemployment benefits was risky business for the junior senator from Massachusetts.
He's shown to be a summertime soldier in that new American revolution.
That pickup truck only gets him so far.
Posted by:Fred

#4  The Dems are a party of three different groups of people.

1) The poor who pay no taxes and but recieve government largess.

2) Wealthy businesses who benefit from government largess, government regulations and government stifled competition. (e.g. Banksters, Warren Buffett, GE and Unions come to mind.)

3) The liberal elite who know what is best for the serfs and benefit from government grants to academia. Includes most government workers in this group.

Any time a lib tells me the Republicans are the party of the wealthy, I make a small wager that if they look up the results for the last election (almost any election in the last 20 years will do), they will find that the dems won a majority of the wealthiest zip codes, or congressional districts, or cities, or states. Those that accept the wager (after paying me off) then tell me they also found that the dems also win the poorest regions as well. I have to explain to them about point 1) above that the dems are the party that takes from the middle class and gives to the poor and wealthy to maintain their hold on power.



On the other hand, the Republicans held congress from 1994 to 2006 and the Presidencey for 20 of the last 30 years and I am sad to say they were not worth a sack of wet hair (with the exception of RR).

I think Obama is every bit the closet Marxist as the next Burger. But at least he help bring about the Tea Party and expose the Dems and Repub for what they really are. Hopefully the election of BO will be a pyrrhic victory for the dems.
Posted by: Eboreg   2010-08-01 23:21  

#3  nah, it is just another one of those lame articles that reads like this:

Though it seems Democrats are now the party of perceived privilege, and GOP is the party of the people, if you look more closely you will see that to be untrue.

They aren't really writing this for you or me, they are writing it for the people who like to think of themselves as "liberal elite". They are starting to get a clue that they are just upper middle class, and not elite enough to make the cut to the upper-crust. It is becoming harder and harder for them to pretend they are intellectually superior to the great unwashed simply by supporting the Democrats and hating Dick Cheney, Sarah Palin, Fox News and the GOP. This article helps make them feel good about themselves by allowing them to continue to delude themselves that they are still superior to the great unwashed because only they can see what you can not. It just appears the dems are the party of privilege but smart people realize that is just an illusion. You simpleton, you!
Posted by: Martini   2010-08-01 17:32  

#2  Joan almost...almost...got off the plantation. Her editor must've reminded her to add the last couple paragraphs
Posted by: Frank G   2010-08-01 14:52  

#1  The GOP is only the party of the people faute de mieux. From Codevilla's famous essay: The GOP does not represent the country class. For it to do so, it would have to become principles-based, as it has not been since the mid-1860s. The few who tried to make it so the party treated as rebels.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2010-08-01 14:42  

00:00