Submit your comments on this article | ||
Africa North | ||
Gaddafi: Europe will 'turn black' unless EU pays Libya £4bn a year | ||
2010-08-31 | ||
Nice little bit of blackmail. Let's see how the Euroweenies respond His remarks, made during a controversial three day visit to Italy, were condemned as "unacceptable blackmail" by Italian MPs, who likened the demand to the protection money that mafia gangs demand from businesses. Speaking at a ceremony in Rome while standing next to Silvio Berlusconi, Italy's prime minister, Col Gaddafi, 67, said that unless his request for money was met, Europe would otherwise become "another Africa" as a result of the "advance of millions of immigrants". "Tomorrow Europe might no longer be European and even black as there are millions who want to come in," he said. "We don't know if Europe will remain an advanced and united continent or if it will be destroyed, as happened with the barbarian invasions".
An MP from the opposition Italy of Values party, Silvana Mura, accused the Libyan leader of holding Europe to ransom, demanding mafia-style protection money in return for a promise to safeguard the continent from unchecked immigration.
| ||
Posted by:tipper |
#8 I'm not so sure Gaddafi is in the wrong, here. Think about what he is asking for. There is a flood of Africans heading to Italy via Libya. He is offering to stop them, if the Italians make it worth his while. Why should he spend a fortune protecting Italy? Just because he is a nice guy? He would have to go out of his way, and spend some big bucks, to stop these illegals. Think of it as reimbursement for the costs. |
Posted by: Anonymoose 2010-08-31 22:55 |
#7 I'm not buying drinks, but if there was an #rclight needed.... |
Posted by: Frank G 2010-08-31 22:22 |
#6 Too bad those F-111s hit the wrong tent... |
Posted by: tu3031 2010-08-31 21:44 |
#5 So much for 'soft' diplomacy. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2010-08-31 21:17 |
#4 IMO ROME didn't somuch "fall" as was bloodily "VISITED" by the Barbarians. * HISTORY CHANNEL + OTHER > By most accounts, ALERIC/ALARIC is portrayed as not personally hating Rome, + is depicted as MIL OR VIOLEN DEFEATING + SACKING ["Robbing"] ROME, BUT NOT DESTROYING IT PER SE EITHER A CITY OR AS A WORLD POWER. Ditto POST-ARMADA SPAIN vee the RISE OF ENGLAND, FRANCE, AUSTRIA, + the DUTCH. Many Perts argue that Spain's wealth + geopol power was actually GREATER FOR CENTURIES AFTER THE DEFEAT OF THE SPANISH ARMADA THAN PRIOR??? "FALL OF ROME" = IMO is correctly more akin to contemporary Pert arguments that its not the POST-COLD WAR USA THAT IS "WEAKENING" PER SE AS MUCH AS THE REST OF THE WORLD IS "RISING" TO NEWFOUND LEVELS OF STATE, REGION-SPECIFIC GEOPOL INFLUENCE ALA "GLOBALISM" = OWG-NWO. e.g. DRUDGEREPORT ARTIC > THE US = US ECON IS "RUSTING" WHILE OTHER WORLD NATIONS ENJOY BETTER OR HIGHER ECON GROWTH RATES. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2010-08-31 20:36 |
#3 The BBC's David Willey says Col Gaddafi's visit to Rome was overshadowed by another controversial speech he made - to two groups of several hundred young Italian women, hired at a fee of 70 or 80 euros each from a local modelling agency. He told them that Islam should become the religion of Europe and gave them free copies of the Koran, after he had lectured them for an hour on the freedoms enjoyed by women in Libya. Nuff said on your motives - A friend of the west - I dont think so |
Posted by: Glolumble Bonaparte5096 2010-08-31 18:23 |
#2 Precisely Ryuge. When one culture enthusiastically embraces pharmaceutical birth control while another categorically rejects it, the outcomes are soon manifested. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2010-08-31 18:15 |
#1 Europeans decided to risk letting Europe "no longer be European" when they stopped having children at a sufficient rate. Someone will be living there, "European" or not, whether from Libya or elsewhere. |
Posted by: ryuge 2010-08-31 18:02 |