Submit your comments on this article |
Europe |
'Get ready for break-up,' says top Belgian minister |
2010-09-06 |
![]() Leading francophone Socialist Laurette Onkelinx, considered a potential successor to party chief Elio Di Rupo, who gave up on negotiations with separatist Flemish leaders on Friday, gave her prognosis in a newspaper interview. 'Let's hope it doesn't come to that because if we split, it will be 'When I look at the letters I receive, loads of people think it's possible. (Our) politicians have to be prepared,' underlined the current caretaker federal minister for health and social affairs. Albert II tasked late on Saturday the respective speakers of Belgium's French-speaking Wallonia and Dutch-speaking Flanders state parliaments to try once more to navigate seven-party talks aimed at securing some form of government, other than the existing day-to-day formation. That came after seven weeks of efforts by Di Rupo, who says that the biggest Flemish party, the independence-minded New Flemish Alliance (N-VA), rejected the widest set of concessions towards full autonomy for Flanders in Belgium's tortured recent history. Belgium, which holds the rotating presidency of the European Union until the end of the year, adding a further layer to the pressure on the sovereign, has not been able to point to a stable government since June 2007. The stark comments from Onkelinx followed those of another leading francophone Socialist, Philippe Moureaux, who has said Belgium was on the verge of a 'progressive organisation of separation.' Formerly taboo among the poorer francophone parts of Belgium, the prospect of going it alone is no longer considered so -- with a third senior official, the head of the Wallonia state government, Rudy Demotte, also telling RTBF radio that 'all options' are now open. Demotte added that Wallonia and the capital region of Brussels, the third federal state and increasingly the focus of arguments about financial settlements, had the wherewithal 'to see what we can do ourselves without waiting for tomorrow.' While located within Flanders' borders, Brussels is officially bi-lingual, although recent studies have shown accelerating numbers of registered French speakers, including the nearly one-in-three who hail from abroad. Tens of thousands of Flemish people, meanwhile, took part on Sunday in an annual demonstration which consists in symbolically 'encircling' Brussels by bike or on foot, to remind locals that they are surrounded by Flanders. |
Posted by:Fred |
#13 Well, alrighty then, its SEDAKA = "DA NEIL" singing his song! |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2010-09-06 23:06 |
#12 Thanks, Parabellum! The Internet is absolutely amazing, isn't it? Though it's kinda worrisom that the link showed possible maps after the breakup, starting with Scenario 11111. Can't help but wonder what Scenarios 00001 through 11110 were. ;-p |
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2010-09-06 18:04 |
#11 Peter Davidson as Doctor Who: "The TARDIS is about to blow a hole in the universe! ... The exact size of Belgium. Well, that's a bit undramatic, isn't it?" |
Posted by: Mizzou Mafia 2010-09-06 14:56 |
#10 I wonder if a post-breakup Flanders would want to join together with Holland...? |
Posted by: Scooter McGruder 2010-09-06 13:01 |
#9 Hopefully Belgiums disintegration is a metaphor for the EUSSR. What's politically convenient for the bureaucratic classes isn't what the people want. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2010-09-06 12:06 |
#8 You have it right, the Flemish produce the wealth and the French consume it. The Wallons please. I, for one wouldn't want those people in France: their culture of unashamed welfare (entire families where all generations from grand-fathers to grown-up grandchildren are on welfare) would cause nauseas on most French. |
Posted by: JFM 2010-09-06 10:52 |
#7 Suppose a country broke up and nobody cared? |
Posted by: tu3031 2010-09-06 10:38 |
#6 Beer? Check. Popcorn? Check. Comfy chair set to full recline? Check. 101 Nano-violins on the stereo? Check. TV on The Belgium Channel? Check. OK, I'm ready. |
Posted by: Grunter 2010-09-06 09:11 |
#5 Here ya go Barbara: http://home.online.no/~vlaenen/flemish_questions/quste27.html That should clear everything up for you. {8^) |
Posted by: Parabellum 2010-09-06 08:04 |
#4 |
Posted by: Goodluck 2010-09-06 06:26 |
#3 Dear g(r)omgoru You have it right, the Flemish produce the wealth and the French consume it. |
Posted by: Bernardz 2010-09-06 06:21 |
#2 This could be entertaining. What would the two (new) countries be called? The Flemish part could be Flanders, of course, but would the rest be Wallonia, or something else? Who gets Would Brussels try to become a separate (third) country? (An EU bureaucrat's wet dream, I'm sure; their own little feifdom funded not by taxes upon the If Belgium breaks up, which would Albert be King of? Would the other country have a king, too, and if so, who? Has anyone looked at how much of the present government's money would go to which country? 50-50, or something else? For that matter, what's the proportion of Flemish and Walloons (or whatever) in the present country? (Apparently, from a little searching on Bing, the Flemish speak Dutch and the rest speak mostly French. |
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2010-09-06 02:21 |
#1 Flemish make good beer & chocolat, but what are the French for? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2010-09-06 01:54 |