You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Surprise! Washington Post can't avoid Black Panther case
2010-09-25
They've avoided any mention of the case for two years, despite masses of reader emails, letters, and even phone calls demanding to know what their rightwing relatives and colleagues are blithering about, admits the Washington Post ombudsman, and even though other major news outlets like the New York Times have done the occasional report... and of course the blogs. But there is plenty more story to cover, quothe he, and anyway, with this article they've made a pretty good start. And actually, they have: the two Post reporters who got the byline hit every point as if there'd never been editorial bias against noticing the story, even linking to the original voting precinct video we all remember so well.

So go to the link, just to reward them for finally doing their job. And as you do, join me in wondering what other stories are they currently avoiding in the hope that if they shut their eyes it will cease to exist.
Posted by:

#10  LOL TW - you just made my night *chuckling*
Posted by: Frank G   2010-09-25 19:50  

#9  Frank used to explain vocabulary to me, back when the world was fresh and new. This says more about him than me, I think.
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-09-25 18:59  

#8  OK fine. The RB archives will prove me...uh..nevermind
Posted by: Frank G   2010-09-25 18:29  

#7  BS, Frank G. You were corrupted long before Ace of Spades.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2010-09-25 18:11  

#6  sorry. Ace Of Spades has corrupted me
Posted by: Frank G   2010-09-25 17:32  

#5  MFM? Ohhhhh. I get it.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2010-09-25 17:17  

#4  see: Klein, Jon, and Zucker, Jeff, joining the unemployed ranks. Perhaps the MFM has decided that Obama cheerleading has a downside?
Posted by: Frank G   2010-09-25 16:06  

#3  Why even bother covering it now?
What has changed?
They've never been interested in the bottom line.

1 - Do they finally sense blood in the water?
2 - They've finally reached the point to toss their prodigy under the bus?
3 - They don't want to go down with him?
4 - In a last desperate grasp of trying to be important and relevant, they'll actually report news?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-09-25 15:52  

#2  NY Times finally covered it one hour ago. If you get your news from the MSM you'll be ignorant of a lot that's going on - and that's the way the MSM / liberals want it.
Posted by: DMFD   2010-09-25 15:35  

#1  ...join me in wondering what other stories are they currently avoiding...

That's always been the part that worries me the most.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2010-09-25 13:27  

00:00