| Submit your comments on this article |
| Economy |
| San Francisco retirement costs for employees only grew 66,733 percent. in the past 10 years |
| 2010-10-25 |
| This is not a conspiracy but, rather, a mathematical certainty. It's also not a surprise. Every San Francisco government official who can do math has known about this calamity for years. This isn't a uniquely San Franciscan problem. Cities and states across the country are facing a pension and health care meltdown. In fact, compared to many retirement systems nationwide, San Francisco's has been well run. There's no rampant corruption (cough, cough, Bell), and it wasn't spectacularly mismanaged (Achoo! San Diego). Many retirement systems would gladly trade places with this city's. But that's because, given the chance, those other cities would actually try to solve the problem. What's uniquely San Franciscan about our benefits crisis is that we aren't trying. San Francisco has known about this looming crisis for a decade — and gone out of its way to make things worse. Want to see the complete list of San Francisco employees whose pensions are over $75,000 (all 2,384 of them!)? |
| Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC |
| #3 ANd iff one believes that US-DEBT-TO-GDP-RATIO is now 93% as a number of MSM-Net Analysts claim, + no longer the official 83%, SAN FRAN HAS A MERE/PALTRY 7.0% LEFT OF DEBT EXPANSION VIA $$$ SPENDING To REACH THE MAGICAL 100%. Or 17% left to reach the magical 110%, becuasde nothing says "SUCCESS" THAN BEING 110.0%-N-HIGHER IN DEBT + RIGHTEOUS BANKRUPTCY. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2010-10-25 19:08 |
| #2 No problem. We'll just up taxes 66,740 percent. Problem solved. Next! |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2010-10-25 14:43 |
| #1 Damn. I should have left my retirement in back in '78. I'd be a millionaire. |
| Posted by: Wheager Hatfield2132 2010-10-25 12:48 |