You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
N. Korea demands S. Korean aid during Red Cross talks
2010-10-28
(KUNA) -- North Korea demanded 500,000 tons of rice and 300, 000 tons of fertilizer in humanitarian aid from South Korea in return for concessions over reunions of families separated by the 1950-53 Korean War, according to South Korea's news pool report Wednesday. South Korean Red Cross delegates told their North Korean counterparts here that their organization had no power to approve such massive aid, a South Korean official involved in the talks told reporters in Seoul. The demand was made during the second day of the Koreas' Red Cross talks. The North asked on Tuesday that the sides increase "humanitarian cooperation projects" as a way to expand chances for families separated by the Korean War to be reunited. The talks in the North Korean border town of Kaesong came ahead of the first family reunions in a year at the Mount Kumgang resort in eastern North Korea from Saturday to next Friday, a sign of easing tension on the peninsula.

More than 80,000 South Koreans are waiting for a chance to be reunited with their loved ones left in the North after the 1950-53 war ended in a truce. About 20,800 Koreans have been reunited since 2000, when the countries' governments held their first summit. South Korea demanded during the two-day talks in Kaesong that the reunions be held at least nine times each year. The South Korean officials said North Korean delegates "tied the reunion issue to rice and fertilizer aid." South Korea stopped sending massive food aid to North Korea after President Lee Myung-bak took office in early 2008 with a pledge to link such assistance to progress in Pyongyang's denuclearization efforts. The relations between the divided countries hit the lowest point in years when the South condemned the North in May for the sinking of one of its warships late March. 46 sailors died in the sinking that the North denies any role in. South Korea shipped 300,000-400,000 tons of rice to North Korea annually before Lee, a conservative, took over. The South this week is sending a shipment of 5,000 tons of rice to the North in flood aid through the Red Cross channel. The North Korean Red Cross is also demanding that the South resume its cross-border tours to Mount Kumgang, where a South Korean tourist was shot to death in 2008 after apparently wandering into a restricted zone.

The tours immediately ground to a halt. North Korea says it has taken every measure to account for the shooting and guarantee safety, while the South calls for a renewed on-site probe and an array of tangible security measures. The tours were long seen as a symbol of inter-Korean reconciliation and won Pyongyang millions of US dollars every year until 2008. On Wednesday, the North renewed its demand that the two governments quickly hold dialogue on ways to revive the cross-border tourism project.
Posted by:Fred

#10  You don't think he's serious, do you, tw? Really?

I'm a simple soul, Ebbang Uluque6305, not subtle at all. (Remember how I reacted the first time you posted? I felt awful, once I realized.) It was for people like me that emoticons and /sarc were invented. When they aren't there, I generally take the statement at face value, even when most people pick up the joke.
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-10-28 21:41  

#9  "Come on guys, give him some outrage."

I'd love to oblige, wr, but I'm laughing too hard.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-10-28 21:35  

#8  Come on guys, give him some outrage. If he doesn't meet his quota, it's off to the camps for HEU.
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2010-10-28 20:57  

#7  You don't think he's serious, do you, tw? Really? Come now, HEU. You're putting us on. Right? That picture of Little Kimmie kinda reminds me of the picture of Joe Biden in today's Seedy Politicians section: If it wasn't so despicably evil it would be funny.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2010-10-28 17:37  

#6  Because good, creative, inspirational art is an individual expressing creativity. Can't have that so the art must be something which looks as though Jim Street did it on the way to morning rations.

Personally I like the Saddam collection, very amusing stuff...other than what it took to put the pictures up that is.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2010-10-28 17:17  

#5  North Korea Best Korea

Thank you, HEU, for my first belly laugh of the day. Check out that healthy Kim Jong-il (the picture taken a decade ago, before the stroke and the unhealthy lifestyle sapped his strength and marred his appearance) standing in a field of wildflowers (that would better have been terraced farms to produce some of the 500k tons of rice North Korea lacks this year). In the distance the mist of chemical weapons rises from the factories in the reeducation camps, where in noisome conditions toil the condemned and all their friends and relations... and their innocent children and grandchildren who grow up with no idea of what their ancestors had done to condemn them to this hell.

Come to think of it, that isn't funny at all. When you die, HEU, I hope you spend an eternity experiencing the memories of those you dismiss with such a treacly attempt at the Great Man style of art. *

* To be fair, the images of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc in Great Man mode were just as bad. Why is it that evil, expansionist, totalitarian dictators inspire such a complete lack artistic imagination?
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-10-28 13:51  

#4  When is North Korea going to give back all that free food and fertilizer?
Posted by: gorb   2010-10-28 13:07  

#3  Shooting people trying to get out rather than shooting people trying to get in is nature's way of migration that say conditions are below sucking level in the former.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-10-28 10:47  

#2  Photobucket
Posted by: HEU   2010-10-28 10:34  

#1  They "DEMAND" we give them food? Uppity litle beggars don't send them ANYTHING until they realise they're NOT in a demnding position of power.
Appologise first and grovel a bit (Lose "Face") then ASK politely.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2010-10-28 09:58  

00:00