You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Examiner Editorial: No union for Transportation Security workers
2010-11-19
[Washington Examiner]
President B.O. and his political appointees have been agitating to unionize the TSA since January 2009. In Senate testimony last December, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano told Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., that she supported collective bargaining for the TSA, even after DeMint noted that every previous DHS administrator had opposed it on security grounds. This suggests that Napolitano's primary concern is not security, but rather keeping Obama's union allies -- who contribute hundreds of millions of dollars to him and his party -- in line for the 2012 campaign.

If each of the TSA's 50,000 employees pays $50 a month, that's $30 million a year in new dues revenue that will likely go to one of the two large federal employee unions vying to represent the TSA, the American Federation of Government Employees or the National Treasury Employees Union. Between them, AFGE and NTEU represent about 750,000 federal workers. The AFGE is affiliated with the AFL-CIO, which joined forces with the Service Employees International Union to spend $88 million electing Democrats in the midterms. The NTEU's Political Action Committee spent $577,597 in the 2010 election cycle, 97 percent of which went to Democrats. If the TSA unionizes, Democratic campaign coffers will get richer at the expense of national security, and it will no longer be merely a figure of speech to claim that federal bureaucrats have taxpayers by the genitals.
Posted by:Fred

#7  Supposedly, the legislation enabling the TSA specifically disallowed unionization.
Posted by: KBK   2010-11-19 22:44  

#6  A noose on a short rope around the neck of Janet Napolitano, tied a very tall light post on the DC Mall would work wonders, too. Of course, we're too "civilized" to do anything like that, even for all the good it would do that entire city.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2010-11-19 16:02  

#5  Allowing government workers to form unions is simply another form of taxation, extorting money from the electorate. Ban them all. Gov't workers who don't like their pay/bennies, are all (1) free to seek more remunerative employment in the private sector and/or (2) directly work as members of the electorate to increase taxes and increase their own pay (as if!).
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2010-11-19 15:33  

#4  I saw an article (not sure where) that SFO opted out of the TSA and went with a private company.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge    2010-11-19 14:11  

#3  Thanks..
Posted by: armyguy   2010-11-19 10:07  

#2  Airports opt out.

TSA gets disbanded, its responsibilities shared among multiple other agencies.
Posted by: Fred   2010-11-19 09:11  

#1  SO.....how does this get stopped??
Posted by: armyguy   2010-11-19 08:06  

00:00