You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Senate rejects earmark ban, 39-56
2010-12-01
[Washington Examiner] An effort by Sens. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., and Tom Coburn, R-Okla., to place a temporary ban on earmarks was defeated. The tally was 39 in favor and 56 against.

There were eight Republican votes against the earmark ban: Bennett of Utah, Cochran, Collins, Inhofe, Lugar, Murkowski, Shelby, and Voinovich.

Seven Democrats voted in favor: Bayh, Bennet of Colorado, Feingold, McCaskill, Udall of Colorado, Nelson, and Warner.
Posted by:Fred

#7  Bennet of Utah demonstrates why he was dumped in a primary. Mukowski shows how stupid the people of Alaska are by voting her back in. Voinovich - good riddance Rino.
Posted by: No I am The Other Beldar   2010-12-01 19:38  

#6  Thad of Ingalls
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-12-01 16:02  

#5  Brownback is a loose cannon, likely will abstain from DREAM as well. If he votes for scream, he will be in real trouble from day 1 in his next job of governor of KS.

The question I have is why is that a question, why not voting for the ban?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2010-12-01 14:56  

#4  same sh*t as usual. Why did Brownback not vote? If he and the other non-voting repub votes along w/the 8 no's switching it goes 49-47 in favor of the ban.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2010-12-01 13:08  

#3  Kick him out so he can invent warp drive.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2010-12-01 09:12  

#2  Thad of Mississippi
Posted by: Frank G   2010-12-01 08:32  

#1  They need to keep up the pressure for the next two years on the supposedly moderate Democrats that are up for reelection in 2012.

Oh, and who is "Cochran"? Not familiar with that one.
Posted by: eLarson   2010-12-01 08:19  

00:00