You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
94 journalists killed in 2010 action
2011-01-01
BRUSSELS - At least 94 journalists died in violence this year, the International Federation of Journalists said Friday, adding that Pakistan was the most dangerous place in 2010 for media workers.

“Journalists and media personnel remain prime targets for political extremists, gangsters and terrorists,” the Brussels-based organisation said in a report, adding that another three died in accidents over the past 12 months.

The death toll came at the hands of “targeted killings, bomb attacks and crossfire incidents,” it said.

In 2009, the total was 139 journalists.

The IFJ said 15 media workers died in Pakistan this year, adding that the majority of the annual fatalities comprised “victims of violence connected to the insurgency war in Pakistan, the drug war in Mexico as well as the political unrest in Honduras.”
Much as we'd be tempted to make fun of this -- for example, saying that 94 dead journalists would be a 'good start' -- it's a serious matter. We at the Burg depend on news from around the world to understand the War on Terror, and it's those very reporters who provide that news who are most at risk, whereas the average reporter at WaPo or the NYT isn't at risk for anything more than being stuck for a lunch tab with a politician. I thank the reporters at places like the Pakistan Daily Times for being brave enough to get out there and report the basic news.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  I'm OK with it. Send Couric next year.
Posted by: Hellfish   2011-01-01 11:41  

#3  ...fewer willing to freelance embed with the Taliban and AQ..even to get those gun camera shots for Wikileaky?
Posted by: P2kontheroad   2011-01-01 09:45  

#2  A considerable reduction from the 139 killed in 2009. 40% smaller pool in dangerous places? Dangerous places less dangerous to journalists? Journalists learning safer behaviors for dangerous places?
Posted by: Glenmore   2011-01-01 08:38  

#1  A war zone is a dangerous place. Wandering around in one is not conducive to longevity. Those who enter such a place to do honest work are very brave souls indeed. Those who have taken a brave stand and made enemies out of the 'wrong' sorts of people I also respect and the ones who have paid the ultimate price for doing so, i mourn.

Most of the rest of them not so much.
Posted by: abu do you love   2011-01-01 07:17  

00:00