| Submit your comments on this article |
| Science & Technology |
| Climate Craziness of the week: a basic science question for NYT reporter Justin Gillis |
| 2011-01-07 |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #2 JosephM, until the 'perts can at least predict the past accurately, we can't much trust their predictions of the future. The only thing that seems certain is that Guam is not going to sink under the waves any time soon... nor go over like a tilt table if too many American troops land on one side without balance on the other. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2011-01-07 23:21 |
| #1 Good Artic + Math. Unfortunately, the basic glitch remains the same, i.e. the ACCURACY = RELIABILITY OF SOLAR BEHAVIOR/SOLAR STORM-FLARE MODELS espec as per MSM-Net, Pert-forecasted STARTING-IN-2012/2013 TECHS-, CIVILIZATION-DAMAGING? [iff not DESTROYING?] SOLAR STORMS??? MATH > essens indics or infers that for the various PERTS' forecasts to be accurate as above, THE SCALE = MAGNITUDE OF THE ANTICIPATED 2012/2013-after SOLAR STORMS-FLARES MUST BE WORSE OR HIGHER THAN IS BEING PUBLICLY STATED. D *** NGED ISAAC NEWTON + MURPHY'S LAWS, etc.! But I digress... |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2011-01-07 19:24 |