You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Father and Mother nomenclature deemed archaic by DOS
2011-01-08
The words “mother” and “father” will be removed from U.S. passport applications and replaced with gender neutral terminology, the State Department says.

“The words in the old form were ‘mother’ and ‘father,’” said Brenda Sprague, deputy assistant Secretary of State for Passport Services. "They are now ‘parent one’ and ‘parent two.’"

A statement on the State Department website noted: “These improvements are being made to provide a gender neutral description of a child’s parents and in recognition of different types of families.” The statement didn't note if it was for child applications only.

The State Department said the new passport applications, not yet available to the public, will be available online soon.
Posted by:Nimble Spemble

#16  Carbon unit IDs

Now what do you have against non-Carbon life forms?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2011-01-08 23:03  

#15  No numbers, sillies!

Spousal unit [name] and spousal unit [name].

Oh, wait. Who gets to go first?
Posted by: Bobby   2011-01-08 21:50  

#14  Nu-Passport* 2084

Carbon unit IDs (place comma between IDs. order your carbon unit IDs in any order you like or random order)

*Only given out to those who have advanced in the learning of the holy Gaia enough to be allowed to travel.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2011-01-08 21:00  

#13  parental unit
Posted by: Skunky Glins****   2011-01-08 20:03  

#12  How about pitcher and catcher?

Thing 01 and Thing 02?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-01-08 18:49  

#11  Stupid idiots.
Posted by: newc   2011-01-08 18:21  

#10  THE UNKNOWN CITIZEN
(To JS/07/M/378
This Marble Monument Is Erected by the State)



...He was married and added five children to the population,
Which our Eugenist says was the right number for a parent of his generation,
And our teachers report that he never interfered with their education.
Was he free? Was he happy? The question is absurd:
Had anything been wrong, we should certainly have heard.


W.H. Auden 1940


The most chilling poem I ever read.
Posted by: Alan Cramer   2011-01-08 14:24  

#9  I feel like a number
I'm not a number
I'm not a number
Dammit I'm a man
I said I'm a man



/Bob Seger
Posted by: Frank G   2011-01-08 12:50  

#8  Great. Now Parent Three can sue for discrimination.

Posted by: RandomJD   2011-01-08 10:58  

#7  Another step down the road that in the end will leave us faceless, nameless, numbered wards of the state.
Posted by: Steve White   2011-01-08 10:28  

#6  You would think they would have eliminated TRUENAME, which, like nobody but Microsoft engineers ever used.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-01-08 10:00  

#5  Well young State Department pollywog, how about...sperm donor and egg donor?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-01-08 09:16  

#4  Of course this now implies that Parent Two is somehow inferior, 'follows', or is 'second class' to Parent One.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2011-01-08 08:57  

#3  "These improvements are being made to provide a gender neutral description of a child's parents and in recognition of different types of families."

Why don't they just SAY... gays and lesbians who adopt children? If it is so righteous, why can we not speak of it freely?
Posted by: Besoeker   2011-01-08 08:39  

#2  Spare the rod...
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-01-08 03:01  

#1  There are obviously bureaucrats who aren't being kept busy enough with real work.

I see a target for budget cuts.
Posted by: Scooter McGruder   2011-01-08 02:25  

00:00