You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Obama reverses drilling decision
2011-01-14
[Al Jazeera] Barack B.O. Obama, the US president, has reversed an earlier decision to expand offshore oil exploration to the Atlantic Ocean and eastern Gulf of Mexico, but allowed deepwater drilling to continue in the part of the Gulf hit by the BP oil disaster.
What with the oil glut and all, I'm surprised he didn't shut down all deepwater drilling.
The move would ban oil and gas exploration in areas such as the area of the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Florida, and the mid- and southern Atlantic Ocean, until at least 2017.
That's to keep the price from dropping like a rock...
Drilling in the Arctic, where only one company, Shell, has applied for a permit to drill a well, would proceed with "the utmost caution," Ken Salazar, the US interior secretary, said on Wednesday.
Wouldn't want to break the Arctic, y'know...
He said the policy reversal was made in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill which brought with it a stricter regulatory regime and tougher safety rules for offshore drilling.
We have lots of oil, got oil coming out our national ears, so we don't need any more exploration or development...
"We have revised our initial March announcement ... to focus and expand our critical resources on areas with leases that are currently active."
You can drive from New York to San Francisco on $10 worth of gas.
However,
The infamous However...
the policy shift does not affect drilling in the central or western Gulf of Mexico, where an kaboom on BP's Deepwater Horizon rig on April 20 triggered the worst maritime oil disaster in US history. "The modified plan allows currently scheduled lease sales to proceed in the western and central Gulf of Mexico, subject to rigorous environmental analysis," the interior secretary said.
"And we mean rigorous! Probably none of them will be approved!"
Mixed reaction
The decision brought mixed reactions from politicians in states that were affected by the oil spill or would have seen oil rigs off their coastlines if exploration had gone ahead in the Atlantic and eastern Gulf.
"Mixed," I suspect, because half the population is below average.
Bill Nelson, a Florida Democratic senator, said the decision would safeguard his state's vital tourism and fishing industries, and Florida's "unique environment".
... but won't do a thing for Florida's stillborn energy production industry.
The US Chamber of Commerce criticised the B.O. regime for keeping "America's abundant oil and natural gas resources under lock and key ... ensuring that we will continue to increase our dependence on foreign oil".
That's okay. We got lotsa money. We can just keep buying from Arabia forever.
John Culberson, a Republican congressman from Texas, also gave the move the thumbs-down, saying it would "raise energy prices, dampen economic growth, send American jobs overseas, and inflict more pain and suffering on American consumers during these difficult economic times".
But surely that'll all be made up for by Green Jobs™? I mean, Green Jobs™ have been popping up left and right, the U.S. unemployment rate dropping so fast that some people are working two or three Green Jobs™ at once, keeping up with the demand and rolling in money, right?
Environmental groups, which had bitterly opposed the March decision, gave the announcement a mixed reception.
Lemme guess: they don't want the itty-bitty bits that have actually been allowed to be allowed?
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) said the move "did not go far enough" because it left the door open for drilling in the Arctic and allowed seismic testing in the Atlantic, both of which could endanger fragile environments and the livelihoods of millions of Americans.
Toldja so. Boy, can I call 'em!
Athan Manuel, of the Sierra Club environmental group, said that while keeping drilling out of the eastern Gulf and Atlantic was a "step in the right direction ... an oil spill like the BP disaster could happen anywhere in Alaska or in the central and western Gulf where drilling is allowed."
"So it shouldn't be allowed there, either. Oil comes from Arabia. Keep it that way!"
The kaboom on the Deepwater Horizon rig killed 11 workers and caused a record 4.9 million barrels, or 185 million gallons, of crude to spew into the sea, crippling the fishing and tourism industries in the Gulf coast states and causing untold damage to the region's fragile eco-system.
Posted by:Fred

#10  I don't think they are approving new drilling permits yet.

Honest question, if not in USA teritorial waters, why does O'shit have ANY say at all?

Doesn't seem government has ANY say.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2011-01-14 22:22  

#9  Are the oil rigs still in the gulf? These are expensive to lie idle. Have they moved on to the highest bidder? Just asking.

The progressives could care less about the little guy other than his or her vote. They are just more hypocritical and self-righteous about things. I don't think they would have many qualms about imposing tyranny on citizens if they could. Oh, come to think of it they have: health insurance, higher taxes, higher gasoline prices, gun control, speech, broadcasting, and environmental restrictions on just about everything moving and stationary.

When I think of progressives, I tend to think of George Soros, Frances Fox Pivens, Bill Ayers. There are others. Frances Fox Piven appears to be a person advocating for the downfall of this country by any means--violence if necessary.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-01-14 16:48  

#8  Steve I have had the same discussion with the same results. It works not because it is sneaky or slanderous, but because it is absolutely true.

Think the Chinese or Cubans could or would give a crap, other than an apology, if one of their rigs goes ballast up off the coast of Florida?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-01-14 12:41  

#7  Oil comes from Arabia. Keep it that way!

Wonder if anyone's ever done any research as to how much Saudi money flows into the coffers of the radical-green groups...seems to me the Soddies and the Watermelons (green outside, red inside for the uninitiated) would be natural allies.
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2011-01-14 11:00  

#6  Bobby: "And these folks think they're progressive?"

You are forgetting the important, unspoken but understood clause in all Progressive beliefs: present company excluded.
Posted by: Grenter, Protector of the Geats   2011-01-14 10:22  

#5  Here is an argument that I find works well with my liberal friends (which is to say, causes them to become red-faced with anger as they search for a way to counter it) --

I first point out the potential environmental problems with drilling. They're with me on that.

I then point out that because we won't drill in our own country, we have to buy oil from elsewhere. Yes, they acknowledge that.

Which means, then, that these other countries take on all of the environmental risk. Hmmm, they don't quite know how to respond.

Especially when I sweetly ask them who they think is better at protecting the environment, the US EPA or the Nigerian EPA.

In all seriousness, the position of the progressive Democrats is just another form of modern-day imperialism: we take resources from the rest of the world and give them increasingly worthless dollars in return.
Posted by: Steve White   2011-01-14 09:11  

#4  I'm surprised he didn't shut down all deepwater drilling.

It's no longer a moratorium, but it never had to be - that was just political posturing. It IS still an effective moratorium, because I don't think they are approving new drilling permits yet. (The only active deepwater drilling I am aware of are water injection wells or sidetracks of existing wells.) While we dither, rigs, crews, support boats, services all move to Brazil or Angola, so even if our government does figure out what to approve the means to drill it anytime soon won't be there.
Posted by: Glenmore   2011-01-14 09:03  

#3  Ima awaiting a citizenship reversal.
Posted by: Besoeker   2011-01-14 08:02  

#2  untold damage to the region's fragile eco-system

We gotta have fewer people - say, one per square mile; hunters and gatherers, grass and berries, loincloths.

But then global warming will go away and you'll have to wear furs, so gotta move further south.

And these folks think they're progressive?
Posted by: Bobby   2011-01-14 06:20  

#1  OPEC oil hit $100 today. High energy prices in WINTER during a recession with rising food and commodities as well as inflation in the currency. This will double dip this nation a plunge too far.
This will devastate the US on all levels, starting with the poor.

Democrats, always looking over their shoulder at the "little guy".
You enslaved the United States to un-friendly actors, and did not even "bat an eye".

You are not a President, Obama, you are a slave owner.

No quarter, no Heaven.
Posted by: newc   2011-01-14 00:13  

00:00