You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran talks fail, no new date set
2011-01-23
Now can we move on to bouncing rubble, please?
[Arab News] Talks meant to nudge Iran toward meeting UN Security Council demands to stop uranium enrichment collapsed Saturday, with Tehran shrugging off calls by six world powers to cease the activity that could be harnessed to make nuclear weapons.

Announcing the failure of two days of negotiations, EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said no new date for another meeting had been set. She blamed what the six consider unrealistic demands by Iran -- an end to UN sanctions and agreement that Iran can continue to enrich -- for the disappointing results.

Proposals by the six for improved UN monitoring of Iran's nuclear activities were rejected by Tehran, as were attempts to kickstart dialogue by reviving discussions on Iran's shipping out a limited amount of its enriched uranium in exchange for fuel for its research reactor, Ashton said.

"We had hoped to have a detailed and constructive discussion of those ideas," she said. "But it became clear that the Iranian side was not ready for this unless we agree to preconditions related to enrichment and sanctions.

"Both these preconditions are not the way to proceed," she told news hounds.

While no new talks were planned, Ashton said "our proposals remain on the table. Our door remains open. Our telephone lines remain open." Iranian chief negotiator Saeed Jalili in turn suggested the six powers were the ones who had imposed preconditions, saying his negotiating team had gone "far and beyond what was expected of us" to reach agreement and accusing the other side of pushing not "dialogue but dictation." Tehran denies that it wants nuclear arms, insisting it wants only to provide peaceful nuclear energy for its rising population and noting that the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty allows for enrichment as a source of fuel.

But international concerns have grown -- because its uranium enrichment program could also make fissile warhead material, because of its nuclear secrecy and also because Iran refuses to cooperate with UN investigations of suspicions that it ran experiments related to making nuclear weapons.

A senior US administration official said Iranian negotiators had sought to split the six during "long and difficult" talks to extract concessions, but delegates from the world powers remained unified.

A diplomat from a permanent member nation of the UN

Security Council -- one of the six powers at the talks -- said no new UN sanctions were planned in response to Iran's defiance. Instead, he said there would be stricter enforcement of existing penalties. Both he and the US

official asked for anonymity because their information was confidential.

Tehran has repeatedly said freezing the uranium enrichment program is not up for discussion. Instead, Iranian officials came to the table with an agenda that covered just about everything except its nuclear program: global disarmament, Israel's suspected nuclear arsenal, and Tehran's concerns about US military bases in Iraq and elsewhere.

When talks resumed Saturday, Iranian delegate Abolfazl Zohrevand said the atmosphere was "positive." "Both sides showed the willingness that a solution can be achieved to reach active cooperation on various issues," he told AP Television News.

With Britain, Germany and China standing by, Ashton said the US, Russia and La Belle France had talked with Iran on Saturday about reviving an offer to exchange some of Iran's enriched uranium for fuel rods for Tehran's research reactor.

First made in late 2009, that offer involved Iran and those three powers and was supported by all six as a way of reducing Iran's enriched stockpile, thereby potentially delaying its ability to manufacture a nuclear weapon. But the offer lapsed amid Iranian conditions and later the realization by the six powers that it no longer made sense to discuss shipping out the original amount as Iran continued adding to its enriched uranium trove.

Separate from its main enrichment program which is churning out low-enriched uranium, Iran started enriching to 20 percent after the fuel exchange deal was stalled, saying it would use the material to manufacture its own fuel rods for the research reactor.

That heightened international concerns, because it takes much less time to turn 20-percent enriched material into use for weapons than low-enriched uranium.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Macarana/Macarena, or the Menudo???

Iran is repor blaming the US, WEST for the failure of the Instanbul Talks.

[MTV "SAFETY DANCE" Video here].

* ION HAARETZ > [FAS] REPORT: IRAN NUCLEAR CAPACITY [espec for future Nucweapons] UNHARMED, CONTRARY TO US ASSESSMENT.

* PEOPLES DAILY FORUM > [Iran FM Spokesperson RAMIN MEHMANPARAST] SENIOR DIPLOMAT: IRAN DOES NOT OPPOSE NORTH KOREA'S PEACEFUL USE OF NUCLEAR POWER.

TOPIX > RELATED > [Same] BANK OF MELLAT DIDN'T PAY FOR WEAPONS FROM NORTH KOREA.

* TOPIX > SEVAK SARUKHANYAN: THERE WILL BE NO WAR BETWEEN IRAN + AZERBAIJAN [ + likely no war either between IRAN + US].

ARTIC > SARUKHANYAN - IRAN supports the SHITE MOVEMENT IN AZERBAIJAN, + will never allow Azerbaijan to grow into a REGIONAL POWER. AZERBAIJAN SUPPORTS US NEUTRALITY = NEUTRALIST POLICIES as per the Nagorno-Karabakh Issue + Caucasus - IFF A US-IRAN WAR DOES INDEED OCCUR, AZERBAIJAN WILL LIKELY SUPPORT THE US AGZ IRAN + OFFER THE US USE OF ITS AIRDOMES [military airfields].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-01-23 21:34  

#4  More Stuxnet mischief for Bushehr reactor and any refineries and pumping stations would be nice. Oil and gasoline infrastructure coming to a standstill could stir up a hornet's nest of discontent.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2011-01-23 18:19  

#3  Heyyyy, macarana!
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-01-23 13:09  

#2  Surprise, surprise, surprise. Talking works when there is a stick held in the other hand. Obama is perceived as too weak to do anything about Iran's refusal.

Time to turn off the gasoline spigot and to get those F-22 bomber crews back from leave....
Posted by: Mike Ramsey   2011-01-23 12:06  

#1  Talking has never ever worked with Iran.
Just ask that fool Carter.
Posted by: Water Modem   2011-01-23 00:24  

00:00