You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
Chaos in Cairo as Mubarak backers, opponents clash
2011-02-02
[Asharq al-Aswat] Supporters of geriatric President Hosni Mubarak attacked protesters with fists, stones and clubs in Cairo on Wednesday as the Egyptian government rejected international calls for the leader to end his 30-year-rule now.

Anti-Mubarak protesters hurled stones back and said the attackers were police in plain clothes, a charge that the government denied.

The attack caused chaotic scenes in central Tahrir Square, some of the Mubarak supporters rode into the crowd on horses and camels and in carriages, wielding whips and sticks.

Opposition figurehead Mohamed ElBaradei, a Nobel Peace laureate, called on the army to intervene to stop the violence, the worst in the nine-day uprising against Mubarak since protesters fought street battles last Friday.

But troops stood by and watched.

The emergence of Mubarak loyalists, whether ordinary citizens or police, thrust a new dynamic into the momentous events in this most populous Arab nation of 80 million people.

The uprising broke out last week as public frustration with corruption, oppression and economic hardship under Mubarak boiled over.

The crisis has alarmed the United States and other Western governments who saw Mubarak as a bulwark of stability in a volatile regional, and has raised the prospect of unrest spreading to other authoritarian Arab countries.

Mubarak went on national television on Tuesday night to say he would not stand in elections scheduled for September but this was not good enough for the protesters, who demanded he leave the country immediately.

President Barack B.O. Obama telephoned the 82-year-old to say Washington wanted him to move faster on political transition.

"What is clear and what I indicated tonight to President Mubarak is my belief that an orderly transition must be meaningful, it must be peaceful and it must begin now," Obama said after speaking to him.

But Mubarak dug his heels in on Wednesday. A Foreign Ministry statement rejected U.S. and European calls for the transition to start immediately and said they "aimed to incite the internal situation in Egypt."

International backing for Mubarak, for three decades a stalwart of the West's Middle East policy and defense against the spread of cut-thoat Islam, crumbled as he tried to brazen out the crisis.

La Belle France, Germany and Britain also urged a speedy transition.

Some of the few words of encouragement for him have come from oil-giant Soddy Arabia, a country seen by many analysts as vulnerable to a similar outbreak of discontent.

Israel, which signed a peace treaty with Egypt in 1979, is also watching the situation in its western neighbor nervously, weighing the possibility that anti-Israeli Islamists might gain a share of power.
Posted by:Fred

#14  Ah, tw.

So you actually do tune in to npr?

Why does that not surprise?
Posted by: pan   2011-02-02 22:52  

#13  And it is Rifaat al Assad...
Posted by: hotspur666   2011-02-02 22:47  

#12  How that name "Eohippus Omirong9605" appear all of a sudden?
Posted by: hotspur666   2011-02-02 22:45  

#11  The media has become worse than the Soviet's Pravda.

No mention of last year nasty riot by policemen over starvation pay.

No mention of the nastier food riots ten years ago where over a thousand where killed.

Aaaaand even less mention of the Hama, Syria,
Ikhwan(Muslim Brothers) riots where Rifaar al Assad bragged of poison gassing 80,000 of
allah's sand monkeys...
Posted by: Eohippus Omirong9605   2011-02-02 22:43  

#10  On NPR they remarked today that the banks are still closed, which means remittances can't come in from abroad... and that people can't withdraw their savings.
Posted by: trailing wife   2011-02-02 22:33  

#9  I'd wait till Saturday to say he's weathered the storm. People are probably starting to hurt, food shortages, no pay, etc. And the mullahs will pump them up Friday. If he's still in good shape Saturday, he's got a chance. But he'll have Barry nipping at his heels until then.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2011-02-02 19:22  

#8  I'm calling this for Mubarak and the military. When all this nonsense started a few weeks ago in Tunisia, I was surprised. Ben Ali just folded and fled, which I think surprised a lot of people and gave false hope to a lot of the bad guys. However Mubarak seems to have weathered the storm, with a few casualties, his son for instance. Watch the Muslim Brotherhood, who identified themselves during the demonstrations to start doing a runner to all points of the compass, declaring themselves as "democrats" needing asylum, over the next few weeks.
I suggest that they are machined gunned at the border of any country they try to pull their mewling trick on.
Posted by: tipper   2011-02-02 18:54  

#7  The Iran comparison is appropriate.

The Mullahs executed the entire senior military heirarchy in Iran, and Egypt's AF will be well aware of their likely fate should a mullahocracy come to power.


Excellent point. I expect the military to fight to the bitter end, if it's not already thoroughly infiltrated with Ikhwan agents.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-02-02 16:47  

#6  The Iran comparison is appropriate.

The Mullahs executed the entire senior military heirarchy in Iran, and Egypt's AF will be well aware of their likely fate should a mullahocracy come to power.
Posted by: phil_b   2011-02-02 16:22  

#5  An Egyptian (born and bred in the US) acquaintance blames Egypt's troubles (or, specifically, Mubarak's dictatorship) on the US. As I've said before, if my acquaintances and much of what is recorded in the media are representative of Muslim public opinion, it's hard to see how we could mollify these people short of sending annual tribute amounting to trillions a year so that Muslims can live in the style to which they'd like to become accustomed, since anything short of that is obviously the result of American imperialism.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-02-02 16:19  

#4  Could be MB, who also cannot visibly be involved in voilence or their gambit is over, trying to spoil image, or secret police vice versa.

I just do not think it is as simple as pro-whoever. I just wonder how many, if placed between pro-mubarak and pro-baradei forces would attack in both directions.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-02-02 16:13  

#3  ...or maybe something that could pass for the Egyptian 'middle class', relatively speaking, who are connected enough to things outside their immediate life to realize what happened to their equivalent in Iran when the imams took over.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-02-02 15:55  

#2  Or maybe they're Egyptian secret police in mufti, finally fighting back.
Posted by: trailing wife   2011-02-02 15:32  

#1  Opposition figurehead Mohamed ElBaradei, a Nobel Peace laureate, called on the army to intervene to stop the violence, the worst in the nine-day uprising against Mubarak since protesters fought street battles last Friday.

But troops stood by and watched.


Guess the army isn't going to auto support ElBacardi either.

The emergence of Mubarak loyalists, whether ordinary citizens or police, thrust a new dynamic into the momentous events in this most populous Arab nation of 80 million people.

Maybe they are not necessarily loyalist to the Mubarak clic, but against the El Baradei clan. Maybe they have issues with the MB and/or such heavy internationally forced installment of an unelected regime, as a couple possible motives.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-02-02 15:21  

00:00