You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
Libya Islamists storm arms depot: 'seize arms, take hostages'
2011-02-20
HT to Weasel Zippers
Islamist gunmen have stormed a military arms depot in Libya and a nearby port and seized numerous weapons and army vehicles after killing four soldiers, a security official said on Sunday.

The group also took several hostages, both soldiers and civilians, and is "threatening to execute them unless a siege by security forces is lifted" in Al-Baida, the official said, asking not to be named.
C'mon Mo - be a man!
"This criminal gang assaulted an army weapons depot and seized 250 weapons, killed four soldiers and wounded 16 others" in the Wednesday operation in Derna, which lies east of Al-Baida and 1,300 kilometres from Tripoli.

"Army Colonel Adnan al-Nwisri joined them and provided them with a rocket-propelled grenade launcher, three pieces of anti-aircraft artillery and 70 Kalashnikov" assault rifles, the source said.

On Friday, he said they attacked the port in Derna and seized an assortment of 70 military vehicles.

It was not immediately clear who the civilians were or where they had been taken hostage.

The group calls itself the "Islamic Emirate of Barqa," after the ancient name of a region of northwest Libya, and the official said its leadership is made up of former Al-Qaeda fighters previously released from jail.

The official said the same group was responsible for the hanging of two policemen in Al-Baida on Friday that was reported in Oea newspaper.
anybody that thought it could get worse than Colonel Sprockets? Raise your hand.
Posted by:Frank G

#3  If, after Lockerbie, GHW Bush had reacted appropriately to an act of war (270 dead!) instead of going to the UN hat in hand, treating the attack as a criminal matter, 9/11 might have been averted.

Doubtful.
Posted by: Pappy   2011-02-20 21:34  

#2  I do believe that even an 'Islamic Emirate of Libya' would be an improvement over Gaddafi.

The Western political class might at least consider a policy of containment whereas the consensus policy towards Gaddafi is abject surrender.

Gaddafi is a mortal enemy of Western civilization, nothing else.

If, after Lockerbie, GHW Bush had reacted appropriately to an act of war (270 dead!) instead of going to the UN hat in hand, treating the attack as a criminal matter, 9/11 might have been averted. Perhaps, after Gaddafi's death at the hand of the US, Saddam would not have started the 2nd Gulf War.

Failure to punish Gaddafi for Lockerbie and failure to punish Iran for Khomeini's Rushdie, both were dangerous displays of Western provocative weakness.
Posted by: Fat Bob Cromotle1803   2011-02-20 17:16  

#1  A geographic note:
This incident ocurred in the NW of the country. All the other incidents have ocurred in the East of the country (which has long standing grievences against Col. 'Daffy).

If this is true, then things are breaking out all over.
Posted by: Frozen Al   2011-02-20 16:39  

00:00