You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
Obama faces pressure to intervene in Libya
2011-02-24
[Ennahar] Pressure mounted on the White House on Tuesday to intervene to stop Muammar Qadaffy's bloody crackdown on democracy protests as a politician close to President Barack B.O. Obama urged oil firms to halt work in Libya.

The United States faced calls to impose sanctions but also to take direct action such as bombing Libyan airfields and imposing no-fly zones -- military steps that most analysts consider unlikely. Some critics questioned Obama's silence on the violence in which hundreds of Libyans have died.

U.S. officials called for an end to the violence but seemed to rule out any unilateral action, stressing the United States was working with other countries on a way forward.

Senator John I was in Vietnam, you know Kerry
... the Senate's current foreign policy expert, filling the empty wingtips of Joe Biden...
, the influential chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, urged the White House to consider reimposing tough sanctions on Libya.

"World leaders must together put Colonel Qadaffy on notice that his cowardly actions will have consequences," Kerry said.

The White House said it was studying Kerry's proposal to reimpose sanctions that were lifted by the Bush administration but, for now, was focused on ending the bloodshed, which sent U.S. oil prices to near 2-1/2-year highs.

Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Kerry's Republican counterpart in the House of Representatives, said the United States and others "should impose economic sanctions, including freezing assets of the regime and imposing a ban on travel."

Obama did not mention Libya when he spoke about small business at a university in Ohio -- in contrast to his German counterpart Angela Merkel, who said she would back sanctions if Qadaffy did not halt the violence.

Obama's administration has been struggling to keep up with the wave of popular uprisings unfolding across the Middle East and North Africa. Each country has presented its own challenges for Washington, which has seen its decades-old Middle East policy upended in a matter of weeks.

Obama spoke out about violence against protesters in Tunisia, Egypt and Bahrain but some analysts saw his silence on Libya as a deliberate tactic.

"Getting into a spitting match with Qadaffy would not be such a smart idea," said Daniel Serwer of Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies. "This guy obviously enjoys the attention so ignoring him may have some virtue."

LIMITED OPTIONS
U.S. options to influence events in Libya are limited, unlike in Egypt and Bahrain where Washington was able to bring pressure to bear as a long-time ally and benefactor. U.S. foreign aid to Libya was less than $1 million in 2010.

Military action does not appear to be on the table, although the United States has not shied from the use of force against Qadaffy in the past. It bombed Tripoli and Libya's second city, Benghazi, in 1986 in retaliation for an attack on a West Berlin disco used by U.S. military personnel.

"There is absolutely no talk of military intervention," said Daniel Byman of the Brookings Institution in Washington. "We don't know the opposition and it is not clear that they would be on our side.
Posted by:Fred

#6  Any of these gung ho's wish to define what Libya is, or will be at d-day, or should be afterwards?

Kerry wants sanctions against Libya, or Kadaffy? What would they do either way, think they give a shit about badges?

Lose by 2 dozen in the public arena cc Egypt, punting on Baharain and Iran, gonna just stroll into the big times in Libya like a rhinestone cowboy, wow, the way you do the things you do.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-02-24 14:21  

#5  The ship sailed on doing anything about Qadaffi a long time ago.

Perhaps Reagan and Bush43 knew something when they didn't take Qadaffi out when they had the chance.

I think Qadaffi is a dangerous megomaniac of the worst and most toxic narcissistic forms but like Tito he's kept a lid on some really nasty irrational groups lurking about. When a strong man leaves, the groups come out of their burrows and the resulting settling of old feuds leads to vast amounts of blood shed. We are still trying to sort out the power vacuum that Tito left behind in the dear departed Yugoslavia.
I'm afraid that if this revolt takes hold in China and KSA, all hell will break loose economically.
Not to sound like an alarmist but we could be fighting at the gates of Vienna again very soon. It's time for us to develop some spine and some cajones on terrorism.
The leftists in the Democratic party fought Bush43 to a standstill on the GWOT and now its become an act of faith to treat terrorism as a non issue compared to gay rights, union pensions and government worker unions.
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2011-02-24 11:57  

#4  See also NEWS KERALA > PRESIDENT OBAMA SAYS US IS PREPARING FULL RANGE OF OPTIONS ON LIBYA'S CRISIS.

* 1960's "DANIEL BOONE" SHOW Theme > Da Bammer has a Plan - yes, a big Plan - and He fought for Libya to make all Libyans free.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-02-24 01:10  

#3  Closer to America = Amerika for POTUS BAMMER...

To wit,

* WORLD NEWS > [Newsvine] HEZBOLLAH WORKING WID [Mexican] CARTELS: HOW MANY TERRORISTS HAVE BEEN SMUGGLED INTO THE US?

ARTIC = Not even the Fed knows the answer wid certainty.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-02-24 00:45  

#2  OTOH TOPIX > [Despite]QUADDAFI IS NO MUBARAK: OVERTHROW MAY MEAN "DESCENT INTO CHAOS".

However imperfect, once Uncle Muammar gave up Libyuh's NucProgs, he became akin to being "OUR MAN IN NORTH AFRICA/SAHARA" FOR THE US-WEST + ANTI-TERROR + ME DEMOCRACY.

Or one of them anyway.

AND, however well-intentioned, the "JASMINE" PROTESTS may usher in something worse.

* SAME > WORLD ECONOMY MAY FALL IFF [Jasmine] RIOTS/PROTESTS SPREADS TO SAUDI ARABIA.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-02-24 00:42  

#1  After bowing and apologizing for every American 'intervention' for the last 60 years, the Prez is now in a no win situation. Expect a lot of 'talk'.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-02-24 00:24  

00:00