You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
'Gaddafi agrees to conditional surrender'
2011-03-08
[Iran Press TV] Embattled Libyan ruler Muammar Qadaffy has reportedly expressed his readiness to hand over power to the revolutionary National Council on his own terms.

Qadaffy has dispatched his special envoy to hold talks with the interim National Council based in Benghazi, Saudi-owned daily Asharq al-Aswat reported citing sources.

The longest-serving leader in the Arab world, however, has set numerous conditions.

The informed sources have told the paper that Qadaffy has demanded safe passage and full protection for all members of his family and the people within his inner circle.

Moreover, the opposition will have to facilitate any departure from Libya for Qadaffy and his associates wishing to leave the country.

Another one of the conditions is that the council does not hand over Qadaffy to the International Criminal Court
... where Milosevich died of old age before being convicted ...
(ICC), the report added.

The Libyan League For Human Rights says at least 6,000 people have been killed so far in Libya.

The UN Security Council has recently imposed sanctions on the Libyan regime and has referred Qadaffy to the International Criminal Court.

The developments come two days after the council held its first formal meeting to discuss the overthrow of Qadaffy.

The council earlier refused to enter talks with the regime unless Qadaffy leaves office.

The 30-member body was established in the eastern city of Benghazi by revolutionary forces following the liberation of several eastern cities.

The council, headed by Libya's former justice minister Mustafa Abdel Jalil, plans to lead the country to an election.

He was among the first high-profile Libyan figures to defect from the Qadaffy regime following the brutal crackdown on opposition protesters.
Posted by:Fred

#8  /mildly offended

Dribble does like to push that offensive limit. He seems at least as knowledgeable as I, but then, I daren't claim to know more than I've learnt here at Rantburg, except in the small areas of my own experience. His writing style, on the other hand, hearkens back to that creative writer who pretended to have spent time in Iraq for The New Republic -- remember him? I'd love to hear from those who've served whether he rings true or not, as I'm not qualified to judge. If I am wrong, I will apologize.
Posted by: trailing wife   2011-03-08 14:59  

#7  Thanks Ebbang . Its the politicians that 'piss their pants' not the soldiers , and for all together differnet reasons than fighting .

We military types roll up our sleeves and get stuck in . To imply we are a feckless bunch of cowards doesnt do you any favours in an otherwise reasonable snark

/mildly offended
Posted by: Oscar   2011-03-08 14:37  

#6  Dribble, I'm no expert but from all I've heard, as a general rule throughout history, British soldiers do not pee their pants.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2011-03-08 12:23  

#5  Good snark indeed Dribble.

However I think the Vampire Vulture Elite of the U.N. are drooling to go in - once things have settled down - to claim credit - and a fresh source of underage girls and boys to exploit. Food for Nookie programs and all that like in other places in Africa.

I get the image of that famous picture of the starving African boy and the patiently waiting vulture.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2011-03-08 11:26  

#4  I nominate Dribble for snark of the day:
Everybody is gonna scratch their balls and watch
Posted by: Water Modem   2011-03-08 10:14  

#3  Isolationist that I am, I still think some very well placed guided munitions (in the 2,000+ pound range) sent honking in from way, way, way up high.... not a bad idea.
Posted by: Besoeker   2011-03-08 09:17  

#2  There are increasingly limited options to where a dictator can flee these days. It used to be that the world was their oyster, but nobody wants the hassle these days.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-03-08 09:07  

#1  If the man, who sanctioned the Lockerbie bombing, survives as leader, then the UKs underwear is the least of our concerns.
Posted by: kojack   2011-03-08 06:19  

00:00