You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
Libya no-fly zone a UN decision, "not US": Clinton
2011-03-10
Any decision to impose a no-fly zone over battle-torn Libya should be taken by the United Nations, aka the Oyster Bay Chowder and Marching Society and "not the United States", U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
... sometimes described as the Smartest Woman in the World and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Frederick T. Frelinghuysen ...
said.

"I think it's very important that it is not a U.S.-led effort because this comes from the people of Libya themselves, This doesn't come from the outside, this doesn't come from some Western power or some Gulf country saying 'This is what you should do'," Clinton told Sky News late on Tuesday.

"We think it is important that the United Nations make that decision... We want to see the international community support it."
Crisis could be protracted
Forces loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Qadaffy
... an Arab institution for 42 years ...
are trying to suppress a revolt against his 41-year rule.

Clinton said the crisis could be protracted.

"We've called for Colonel Qadaffy to leave. We believe that he has totally given up any legitimacy to power. When a leader turns against his own people, that is the end. But we know that there is a long road ahead for being able to try to resolve this."

"We'd like to see this resolved peacefully. We would like to see him (Qadaffy) go peacefully. We would like to see a new government come peacefully," Clinton said.

"But if that's not possible, then we are going to work with the international community. Now there are countries that do not agree with that and we think it's important that the United Nations make this decision, not the United States. So far the United Nations has not done that," she said.

Asked about the possibility of lifting a recently imposed arms embargo on Libya and supporting the rebels, Clinton said:

"Everything is being looked at. It is difficult in the midst of this civil conflict that's going on now to even know how you would do that, because right now it's not clear what part of the country is actually under rebel control."
Western allies divided
Britain and La Belle France are working on a U.N. Security Council resolution establishing a no-fly zone over Libya which they could put forward if they believed conditions warranted it.

But Western allies still appear divided over the wisdom of a no-fly zone and how it would be implemented, and there are doubts over whether China and Russia would support a Security Council resolution authorizing such a zone.

Pressed on whether the United States would support a no-fly zone, Clinton said: "We are going to support the efforts that are being made because we think that the people of Libya themselves have to be supported and we know how difficult this struggle is."

U.S. President Barack B.O. Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron
... British PM Cameron describes himself as a modern compassionate conservative and has spoken of a need for a new style of politics that doesn't involve calling people names. He has stated that he is certainly a big Thatcher fan, but I don't know whether that makes me a Thatcherite, which means he's probably not. He has also claimed to be a liberal Conservative, and a very tall short person. Since he is not deeply ideological he lacks core principles and is easily led. He has urged politicians to concentrate on improving people's happiness and general well-being, instead of focusing solely on financial wealth, which is easy for a stockbroker's kid to say. Ask him to lend you ten quid and see how that works out. He has been described as certainly not a Pitt, Elder or Younger, but he does wear a nice suit so maybe he's Beau Brummel ...
agreed in a telephone call on Tuesday to press forward with planning on a range of possible responses to the Libyan crisis, including a no-fly zone, the White House said.

Clinton's remarks echoed earlier comments from British Foreign Secretary William Hague.

"There must be a demonstrable need that is accepted broadly by the international community, as well as the strong international support that would come from that," Hague said.

Republican senator John Maverick McCain
... the former presidential candidate and even more former foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution...
later told BBC's Newsnight program that the U.S. should consider immediate action.

"People are being massacred. Isn't it an obligation that the world has to stop a mad dictator from massacring his own people?" asked the 2008 presidential candidate.

"If we don't have the military capability to take on their defenses and their air force, then we have wasted a great deal of American treasure. We can handle the Libyan air force and defenses, I know we can," he added.
Posted by:Fred

#4  Looking at the pictures I would say that Qadaffy Duck looks more statesman-like than Clinton.
Posted by: kelly   2011-03-10 20:18  

#3  On minor benefit from all this leadership vacuum is that the rest of the world, including the Europeans themselves, see how empty the West is absent the US. Since we are now afraid to made any decisions beyond saying things are unacceptable and lifting our presidential chin in a look of imperious arrogance, the Euros and the rest of the people begin to see the chaos and danger that lurks in a world without a leader. I'm not sure we shouldn't just reinvent the Monroe Doctrine, pull everybody back into our hemisphere, and give the ChiComms and the Russian plutocrats and the Eurocrats the stage and see the gordian knot they make.
We're broke, and its time to fix things at home. The Wisconsin display is a clear message how much clean up on aisle America we need to do.
I think we are about to revisit the 60's as the Dems suddenly see the cash cows begin to choke and the leftie knives actuall come out.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2011-03-10 16:47  

#2  ...and there are doubts over whether China and Russia would support a Security Council resolution authorizing such a zone.

Ummm...no not really. There's no "doubt" that either, if not both, China and Russia would veto a Libyan NFZ resolution. And the Madam Secretary knows it. Never the less, it's a good way to appear all measured and diplomatic while her boss tries to figure out which decision will make him look best.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2011-03-10 10:17  

#1  I don't think "the world" gives a good crap, Johnnie.
Posted by: mojo   2011-03-10 02:35  

00:00