You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Cigarette displays to be banned in English stores
2011-03-11
[Arab News] The cigarette packs piled into prominent displays behind store counters and supermarket checkouts in England can't be missed. They occupy prime retail real estate, helping to keep addicts hooked and quitters tempted.

But the government announced a ban on them Wednesday, a move that will keep cigarettes hidden away and make it just a tad more difficult for smokers to find their fix.

"We cannot ignore the targeting of young people through these displays," England's chief medical officer Sally Davies said in a statement, adding the can't-miss-it advertising encourages teens "to start smoking at an age when they are less able to make an informed choice." England is following the lead of countries such as Iceland, Ireland and Canada, all of which have already forced cigarettes under the counter. Finland is also planning to introduce a ban on over-the-counter advertising in 2012, and a similar ban went into force in Norway at the beginning of last year.

That last ban even applies to imitation tobacco products such as chocolate cigarettes and licorice smoking pipes.

Cigarette packs in the UK already carry gruesome images of cancer-ridden lungs, corpses and tumors. Authorities are still mulling proposals to impose generic packaging on all tobacco products -- a move that would force cigarette makers to use plain, logo-free packs, aside from health warnings.

Australia is already working toward a generic packaging system. If it followed suit, England would be the first nation in Europe to do so.

Meanwhile,
...back at the ranch...
the English display ban drew predictable responses from both sides of the tobacco wars, with health groups cheering and retailers grumbling.

The Association of Convenience Stores said the new regulations would impose 40 million pounds ($65 million) in costs as owners dismantled displays and refit counters, while the National Federation of Retail Newsagents described it as a "betrayal of our nation of shopkeepers." Both groups argued that there was no evidence to show such a ban would help improve public health.

Doctors disagreed. The British Medical Association said it was "very pleased" with the announcement, citing research which it said showed that a display ban would play "a key role in discouraging children from smoking and ... also help smokers quit." The association's only complaint was about the deadline -- which forces larger stores to take down their displays by April of 2012 and gives smaller stores an extra three years to comply with the ban.
Posted by:Fred

#1  Whatever. How about torching those poppy fields first?
Posted by: Rhodesiafever   2011-03-11 17:28  

00:00