You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
Arab League bitches, moans about strikes in Libya
2011-03-21
[Ennahar] Western forces pounded Libya's air defences and patrolled its skies on Sunday, but their day-old intervention hit a serious diplomatic setback as the vaporous Arab League chief condemned the "bombardment of civilians."

Libyan leader Muammar Qadaffy
... a proud Arab institution for 42 years ...
vowed to defeat the Western powers' "terrorism" and sent his troops and tanks into the rebel-held coastal city of Misrata, residents said.

European and U.S. forces unleashed warplanes and cruise missiles against Qadaffy on Saturday in a United Nations, aka the Oyster Bay Chowder and Marching Society-backed intervention to prevent the veteran leader from killing civilians as he fights an uprising against his 41-year rule.

But Arab League chief Jerry Lewis doppelgänger Amr Moussa
... who has been head of the Arab League since about the time Jerry and Dean split up ...
said what was happening was not what Arabs had envisaged when they called for the imposition of a no-fly zone over Libya.

"What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians," he said.

In comments carried by Egypt's official state news agency, Moussa also said he was calling for an emergency Arab League meeting.

Arab backing for a no-fly zone provided crucial underpinning for the passage of the U.N. Security Council resolution last week that paved the way for the Western intervention, the biggest against an Arab country since the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Withdrawal of that support would make it much harder to pursue what some defense analysts say could in any case be a difficult, open-ended campaign with an uncertain outcome.

The U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, said the no-fly zone was effectively in place. But he told CBS the endgame of military action was "very uncertain" and acknowledged it could end in a stalemate with Qadaffy.

Mullen said he had seen no reports of civilian casualties from the Western strikes. But Russia said there had been such casualties and called on Britain, La Belle France and the United States to halt the "non-selective use of force."

The aerial assault stopped in its tracks the advance by Qadaffy's troops into the eastern city of Benghazi, and left the burned and shattered remains of his tanks and troop carriers littering the main road outside the rebel stronghold.

The charred bodies of at least 14 government soldiers lay scattered in the desert.

"Qadaffy is like a chicken and the coalition is plucking his feathers so he can't fly. The revolutionaries will slit his neck," said Fathi Bin Saud, a 52-year-old rebel carrying a rocket-propelled grenade launcher, surveying the wreckage.

Qadaffy said the raids amounted to terrorism and vowed to fight to the death. "We will not leave our land and we will liberate it," he said on state television. "We will remain alive and you will all die."

A Libyan government health official said the corpse count from the Western air strikes had risen to 64 on Sunday after some of the maimed died. But it was impossible to independently verify the reports as government minders refused to take Western news hounds in the capital Tripoli to the site of the bombings.
Posted by:Fred

#12  When you think of the Arab League envision hairless pink irradiated rats with translucent red eyes throwing themselves foaming at the glass where you have placed your warm hand.

Moslems are not your friends.
Posted by: Dribble2716   2011-03-21 22:45  

#11  For the most part, the Libyans seem to be for what's happening now.

Whose opinion matters?

And after Gadaffy disappears, will Libyans remember what the rest of the AL bitches were moaning about?
Posted by: gorb   2011-03-21 15:03  

#10  #9 Perhaps my eye is overly sensitized to extraneous commas from proofreading, but I believe the headline should read:
Arab League bitches moan about strikes in Libya


LOL about that!
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-03-21 14:15  

#9  Perhaps my eye is overly sensitized to extraneous commas from proofreading, but I believe the headline should read:

Arab League bitches moan about strikes in Libya

On more serious note, I wonder how much of this boilerplate outrage is the usual double-diplo-speak. Yeah, the West is pulling our chestnuts out of the fire yet again, but theology demands we disapprove of infidels killing Mooselims.
Posted by: SteveS   2011-03-21 12:18  

#8  The Arab way of saying "Thanks infidel." for doing their dirty work.
Posted by: Oscar Spineck3066   2011-03-21 10:54  

#7  Ghadaffi threatens to kill civilians and there seems to be little outrage from the muslim community. Ghadaffi revs up the propaganda machine and says the West is killing civilians. The Arab community is then outraged about civilian deaths which have not been proven. Blood is thicker than water. Snakes.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-03-21 10:47  

#6  It's almost as if the Arab League had no idea what a 'no-fly zone' actually is, or how one goes about enforcing such a zone.
Posted by: Steve White   2011-03-21 09:19  

#5  When the smoke clears Qadaffy Duck will reign supreme, NATO will look stupid but no one will officially notice, the rebels (whoever they are) will be mostly dead, the UN will divert attention by passing a motion to condemn Israel for something or other, the US will be even broker for no gain, and the President will grow weary of it all and go on vacation.
Posted by: kelly   2011-03-21 08:25  

#4  This morning on the radio they had some honcho from the Arab League, who - thru a translator - said they didn't want any bombing, just a no-fly zone.

Huh? Like it was an invisible, magic shield, or maybe an Arab cease-fire.

And who said anything about removing kaDaffy?
Posted by: Bobby   2011-03-21 06:03  

#3  Telegraph View: The instant wavering from the Arab League over the bombing of the Libyan regime was sadly predictable...In foreign affairs, as in so many areas, Mr Obama's intentions are hard to read; if he thinks the Libyan intervention will damage his standing in the Middle East – or the Midwest – then there is no guarantee that he will not make America's excuses and leave. Moreover, there is no evidence that either he or Mr Cameron has considered what sacrifices might be needed to remove Gaddafi, let alone a clear vision of what a post-Gaddafi Libya ought to look like.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-03-21 04:25  

#2  vaporous Arab League chief condemned the "bombardment of civilians.

I don't remember them being concerned about the bombardment (with gasses) of Kurdish civiliains or of Negro civilians in Sudan. I know, I know it is not the same thing: then the bombed were not from the HerrensVolk and now the bombers are filthy kaffirs
Posted by: JFM   2011-03-21 02:58  

#1  More mindless drivel. Do you think these "leaders" could ever embarrass themselves with this swill?
Posted by: Ackoopmed   2011-03-21 00:48  

00:00