| Submit your comments on this article |
| Africa North |
| EU official: Arab League head misquoted on Libya |
| 2011-03-22 |
| [Asharq al-Aswat] The European Union's top foreign policy official brushed aside concerns Monday that the coalition supporting military action against Libyan leader Col. Muammar Qadaffy is already starting to fracture, saying the head of the vaporous Arab League was misquoted as criticizing the operation. NATO, meanwhile, was struggling with its own internal divisions, having been blocked so far by member Turkey from participating in enforcing a no-fly zone over Libya. Support from the Arab League had been critical to international action against Qadaffy's regime. But on Sunday, hours after the international operation began, the league's chief was quoted as telling news hounds in Cairo that it should not have included attacks on targets on the ground. "What happened differs from the no-fly zone objectives," Amr Musa was said. "What we want is civilians' protection not shelling more civilians." But EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said Monday there had been a misunderstanding. She spoke on her way into a meeting of EU foreign ministers at which Libya will be discussed. "Musa was misquoted, as I understand it," she said. She did not specify her understanding of what Musa actually said. German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, however, offered Musa's comments as evidence that Germany's decision not to participate in the operation had been justified. "This does not mean that we are neutral," Westerwelle said on his way into the same meeting. "This does not mean that we have any sympathy with the dictator Qadaffy. It means that we see the risks, and when we listen closely to what the Arab League yesterday said, unfortunately we see that we had reasons for our concerns." Westerwelle said Germany would focus on broadening economic and financial sanctions against the Qadaffy regime. Late Sunday, NATO's top decision-making body approved a military plan to implement the U.N. arms embargo on Libya. But so far it has failed to agree on a separate plan for the alliance to enforce the no-fly zone because of opposition from Turkey, which has vast business interests in the north African country. Officials said the North Atlantic Council will discuss the no-fly plan when national envoys meet in Brussels on Monday, and may issue an order to alliance forces to implement it. The Council requires the consensus of all 28 member states to endorse such an order. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Monday that Turkey has conditions for its support. "NATO should only enter Libya to determine that Libya belongs to Libyans and not to distribute its natural resources and richness to others," Erdogan said, speaking in Soddy Arabia. And he said the operation must end without turning into an occupation. A decision to participate would require the approval of all 28 NATO members. Early Sunday, U.S. French and British planes began bombarding Libyan military targets with a barrage of Tomahawk cruise missiles and precision bombs. Late in the day, a cruise missile blasted Qadaffy's residential compound. A rebellion against Qadaffy's 42-year rule broke out last month. Initially rebels made significant progress, but forces loyal to Qadaffy turned the tide and retook control of significant amounts of territory. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #2 "Libyans to Libyans and not distribute its natural resources and richness to Others" > Yokay, I'll bite, SUBJECTIVELY SPEAKING ISN'T THAT CONTRARY TO THE IDEALS, TENETS + REQUIREMENTS, ETC, OF SO-CALLED "GLOBALISM", e.g. "ANTI-NATIONALISM/STATE NATIONALISM" + BIG POWERS GIVING + SHARING TO THE SMALLER/LESSOR POWERS??? Lest we fergit,MSM-NET > Artics on GLOBALISM = "NOT THE DECLINE OF THE US [US-West] BUT THE RISE OF THE REST OF THE WORLD/EVERYBODY ELSE"??? [SEXY SLINKY CAMERON "WHATEVER HAPPENED TO 'WHATS MINE IS ALSO YOURS, BABY!?'" DIAZ Movie here]. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2011-03-22 23:23 |
| #1 OH WHEN...when will the noble Asrabs get their "respect" back.....? "Musa Musa al Koussa was misquoted, as I understand it," she said. She did not specify her understanding of what Musa actually said." |
| Posted by: Dribble2716 2011-03-22 03:52 |