You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Clinton rules out US Syria involvement for now
2011-03-28
WASHINGTON - U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
not to be confused with John Foster Dulles...
on Sunday ruled out the United States getting involved in Syria in the same way as it has in Libya for now, saying in a TV interview that each Arab uprising was unique.
Nothing like telling our enemies in advance what our limits are.
Speaking in an interview which was taped on Saturday, Clinton said the United Stated deplored the violence in Syria but the circumstances were different in Libya, where Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi had used his air force as well as heavy armor against civilians.

Asked if one should expect a U.S. involvement in Syria along the lines of the no-fly zone that the United States and other nations have imposed over Libya, Clinton told CBS News' "Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer" program "no."

"Each of these situations is unique," she added in a transcript of the interview released by CBS.
Since Syria is a dangerous enemy and Libya is just an enemy.
Libya also isn't known to be holding any Americans, while Syria is.
"Certainly we deplore the violence in Syria, we call as we have on all of these governments ... to be responding to their people's needs, not to engage in violence, permit peaceful protests and begin a process of economic and political reform."
Sure. Pencilneck will listen to that, just like his daddy did.
Clinton suggested the circumstances in the two nations differed in that there was not the same level of violence in Syria and the government's crackdown on protests there had not yet engendered global condemnation or calls from the Arab League and others for a no-fly zone as there was with Libya.
As Wednesday Addams would say, "wait".
"If there were a coalition of the international community, if there was the passage of a Security Council resolution, if there were a call by the Arab League, if there was a condemnation that was universal, but that is not going to happen because I don't think it is yet clear what will occur, what will unfold (in Syria)," Clinton said.

"What's been happening there the last few weeks is deeply concerning, but there's a difference between calling out aircraft and indiscriminately strafing and bombing your own cities (as in Libya), than police actions which frankly have exceeded the use of force that any of us would want to see," she added.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  I wonder did she not make the same statement about Libya a matter of days or a few weeks before the cruise missiles came over the horizon?
Posted by: The Other Beldar   2011-03-28 13:07  

#3  Speaking in an interview which was taped on Saturday, Clinton said the United Stated deplored the violence in Syria but the circumstances were different in Libya, where Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi had used his air force as well as heavy armor against civilians.

Schieffer didn't ask her if oil has anything to do with it? Seems like an obvious question to me.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2011-03-28 12:35  

#2  The Obama Doctrine:

We are willing to take on ill defined operations of indeterminate length in support of rebel leaders that we know almost nothing about without congressional approval or even consultation if there is air based strafing of civilians and the UN and the Arab League ask us to do so. On the other hand, operations against committed enemies of the US who support active terrorist organizations are completely safe as long as they are killing people using ground based weapons or as long as the UN and the Arab League don't ask us to intervene.

Well OK then.
Posted by: Lord Garth   2011-03-28 09:49  

#1  Hat tip Richard Fernandez.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-03-28 03:33  

00:00