[Arab News] US appeals court judges on Tuesday rejected what a Guantanamo Bay detainee's defense because they found it unlikely he was an innocent who repeatedly just happened to find himself at hot spots in the war against Al-Qaeda.
Uthman Abdul Rahim Mohammed Uthman of Yemen won a lower court decision granting his release after more than nine years at the US naval prison for terror suspects in Cuba.
But a three-judge appellate panel overturned that ruling.
| Just because he was from Yemen... |
Uthman says he was mistaken as an Al-Qaeda fighter fleeing US bombardment of Tora Bora when he was captured at the Afghan-Pak border in December 2001. The US government says Uthman was one of Osama Bin Laden's bodyguards and fought against anti-Taliban forces, claims he denied.
Uthman said he went to Afghanistan to teach the Qur'an
| Because Afghanistan doesn't have enough madrassah teachers... |
| It seems Yemenis have the perfect accent, always worth paying extra to acquire. |
and was doing so in Kabul on Sept. 11, 2001. He said he decamped after the United States began fighting the Taliban regime, but instead of taking the more direct eastward route to Pakistain he followed his interpreter south through the mountainous region toward Tora Bora. That's where Bin Laden had relocated as Al-Qaeda gathered for a major battle against the United States and its allies and where Uthman says he happened to meet up with some schoolmates he was later captured with.
| Boy howdy but is the world ever a small place... |
The school they had attended was the Furqan Institute, a religious school in Yemen where Al-Qaeda had recruited fighters. Among those schoolmates in Uthman's group were two admitted Bin Laden bodyguards and a Taliban fighter.
The court also found that Uthman traveled to Afghanistan along a route used by Al-Qaeda recruits and was seen at an Al-Qaeda guesthouse. Uthman said none of that proved he was a member of Al-Qaeda.
"Uthman's account piles coincidence upon coincidence upon coincidence," the appeals court wrote. "Here, as with the liable or guilty party in any civil or criminal case, it remains possible that Uthman was innocently going about his business and just happened to show up in a variety of extraordinary places. But Uthman's account at best strains credulity, and the far more likely explanation for the plethora of damning circumstantial evidence is that he was part of Al-Qaeda."
US District Judge Henry Kennedy Jr. had ruled that the US government did not prove that Uthman received and executed orders from Al-Qaeda, the so-called "command structure test." But since that ruling, the appeals court has rejected that formal standard for determining whether a detainee was part of Al-Qaeda and instead ordered that judges look at each detainee's actions individually to determine if he was a member of the terrorist group.
| An outbreak of common sense? Can't be the Ninth Circus Court... |
The appeals court also found Uthman's version suspicious because he claimed he paid for his travel to Afghanistan himself primarily by working summers selling food at a roadside shack. But the government argued Uthman would have had to earn more than three times the average Yemeni's annual income in only a few summers of unskilled work. The lower court found that Uthman actually received the money from a well-moneyed sheik, and the appeals court said the false statement was strong evidence of his guilt.
According to a count by the Justice Department, judges in the Washington federal court have now ordered the release of 34 detainees and ruled that 21 are being properly held.
But many of those who have won their right to release remain at Guantanamo Bay because no other country will accept them.
| But they're innocent, you know... |
|