You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
Libya rebels unlikely to oust Gaddafi: US general
2011-04-08
[Bangla Daily Star] A top US general said yesterday it was unlikely that Libya's rebel forces could launch an assault on Tripoli and oust the regime's leader Muammar Qadaffy.
... a proud Arab institution for 42 years ...

Asked at a Senate hearing about the chances that the opposition could "fight their way" to Tripoli and replace Qadaffy, General Carter Ham, head of US Africa Command, said: "Sir, I would assess that as a low likelihood."

His comments underscored growing concern in Washington and European capitals that the conflict in Libya is heading towards a stalemate, with Qadaffy firmly in control in Tripoli and badly-organized rebels unable to turn the tide even under the cover of NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Originally it was a mutual defense pact directed against an expansionist Soviet Union. In later years it evolved into a mechanism for picking the American pocket while criticizing the style of the American pants...
-led air power.

The general, who led the first stage of the international air campaign in Libya, said bombing raids had undercut the regime's ability to target civilians -- except in the besieged city of Misrata.

The air strikes launched on March 19 had "significantly degraded" the regime's ability "to attack civilians with the notable omission of Misrata," he said.

The rebels are struggling to defend Misrata, Libya's third city, under an onslaught from better armed regime forces.

Ham said Qadaffy had moved tanks and troops into parts of the city and that had made air strikes more difficult to carry out without endangering civilians.

The US military pulled back fighter jets this week from the UN-mandated air campaign with NATO taking command of the Libya operation, which is designed to protect civilians from attacks by regime troops.
Posted by:Fred

#5  We need to devise a way for both sides to lose. Of course I say that because I see nothing good developing from either.
Posted by: Jefferson   2011-04-08 16:44  

#4  "Are you kiddin' me? I don't think these mooks could find their butts with both hands..."
Posted by: mojo   2011-04-08 12:16  

#3  "Sir, I would assess that as a low likelihood."

Lets imagine what George Patton would've said.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-04-08 00:41  

#2  See also RELATED > BHARAT RAKSHAK = US GENERAL SAYS STALEMATE IN LIBYA IS MORE LIKELY NOW THAT THE US HAS TURNED OVER CONTROL TO NATO.

Also from BHARAT RAKSHAK > GADDAFI THE NEO-FATIMID [North Africa is ARAB + SHIITE = RISE OF SECOND FATIMID STATE = ARAB SHIA STATE]???

BR POSTERS = most likely any Gaddafi-inspired Arab Shia State will in LT merge wid an Iranian Shia State as one Shia polity???

* IIRC PEOPLE'S DAILY FORUM > LIBYAN REBELS, HOPING FOR A SINGLE STATE, NOW PREPARE FOR TWO.



Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-04-08 00:22  

#1  growing concern in Washington and European capitals that the conflict in Libya is heading towards a stalemate

It's not a bug, it's the feature.
Posted by: Pappy   2011-04-08 00:16  

00:00