Submit your comments on this article | ||
Home Front: Politix | ||
Pentagon warns on big defense cuts | ||
2011-04-14 | ||
Arms makers' shares sold off after Obama made a speech on the budget deficit in which he called, in effect, for holding growth in the Pentagon's core budget, excluding war costs, below inflation through 2023, starting in fiscal 2013. The squeeze on the Pentagon's budget, which has roughly doubled since 2001, is part of a larger drive to cut the budget deficit by $4 trillion over the 10-year period. "It's not just a math exercise which is 'cut $400 billion'," said Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary. "It's 'let's review our roles and our missions and see what we can forgo, or pare down, in this age of fiscal constraint, where we are all collectively trying to work with the deficit problem.'" The Pentagon has been tightening its belt in the hope of warding off deep cuts amid the concern over budget deficits. Defense Secretary Robert Gates already had eliminated or scaled back more than 20 troubled or "excess" weapons programs since April 2009. Last June he ordered the military to come up with more than $100 billion in overhead savings over five years, which could be reinvested in higher priority programs. The chairmen of Obama's deficit commission as well as a Bipartisan Policy Center Debt Reduction Task Force each had called for cuts in projected military spending of up to $1 trillion over 10 years, far more than Obama proposed. The core Pentagon budget is now about $530 billion, roughly $10 billion less than Gates said was critical when the Obama administration sent Congress its spending plan for 2012. The Defense Department could easily meet Obama's goal -- which amounts to saving an average of about $40 billion a year -- without jeopardizing the U.S. military's global dominance, said Gordon Adams, a senior White House official for national security budgets from 1993 to 1997. "It's fundamentally trivial," he said. "This is stuff a comptroller can do while playing with his prayer beads." He suggested it would mean shrinking the force "a bit," trimming and deferring some hardware purchases and finding more efficient ways to handle operations and maintenance spending.
Gates said in January the United States planned to cut $78 billion in defense spending over five years, including a reduction of up to 47,000 troops. That came on top of the $100 billion cost-savings drive that Gates kicked off last year. "My greatest fear is that in economic tough times that people will see the defense budget as the place to solve the nation's deficit problems," Gates said last August. | ||
Posted by:Steve White |
#6 Cut ethanol subsidies, permit much more drilling and collect the normal taxes on the increased income from the new oil production. Win-Win. |
Posted by: The Other Beldar 2011-04-14 11:02 |
#5 Not counting monies allocated separately for the prosecution of the war, using 2010 levels, all cuts in defense and in manning authorization must be applied proportionately to all other federal departments and agencies. That is what should be negotiated. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2011-04-14 08:53 |
#4 "It's fundamentally trivial," he said. "This is stuff a comptroller can do while playing with his prayer beads."em> Under any other administration, one might have thought this a strange turn of phrase. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2011-04-14 06:10 |
#3 Ah, except for wars. So zero can still throw his weight around. Syria's next! |
Posted by: Bobby 2011-04-14 06:04 |
#2 YNETNEWS > IMF: MANY EURO BANKS ON SHAKY GROUND, wid multiple internal or lending problems. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2011-04-14 01:13 |
#1 See GUAMPDN FORUMS POSTER THREAD > MILITARY CONSTRUCTION IS REALLY GETTING CUT, which IHO may explain why Mil Contrux on Guam has seemingly stopped??? |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2011-04-14 00:06 |