You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Marijuana causes global warming, uses 1% of U.S. electricity
2011-04-14
People growing marijuana indoors use 1 percent of the U.S. electricity supply, and they create 17 million metric tons of carbon dioxide every year (not counting the smoke exhaled) according to a report by Evan Mills, an energy analyst at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

After medical pot use was made legal in California in 1996, Mills says, per-person residential electricity use in Humboldt County jumped 50 percent compared to other parts of the state.

In order to produce some 17,000 metric tons of marijuana this year, Mills estimates authorized growers will use $5 billion worth of energy. That works out to the output of seven big electric power plants.

Much of the carbon dioxide produced by the industry comes from transportation, though the need for lights "500-times greater than recommended for reading" also uses a lot of power and generates a lot of pollution. Air conditioning, ventilation and humidity control also contribute.

In California, some 400,000 authorized growers use about 3 percent of the state's electricity for their business.

"This corresponds to the electricity use of 1 million average California homes, greenhouse-gas emissions equal to those from 1 million average cars, and energy expenditures of $3 billion a year," Mills says. However, since California is such a green state, it only generates 20 percent of national carbon dioxide emissions from pot growing, while using 70 percent of nationwide energy for this industry

Posted by:tipper

#11  I have a hard time believing the !% of US electricity.

It seems to me that the LBNL is based on an increase in use in Humboldt county and was SWAGged and extrapolated beyond the validity of the data.

It wouldn't be the first time LBNL has done a wild eyed study and released the results before it could be peer reviewed.
Posted by: lord garth   2011-04-14 13:08  

#10  I dunno about that carbon dioxide claim. Wouldn't the oxygen produced the plants themselves offset the carbon dioxide?

Some growers artificially increase the CO2 in their grow room. The plants grow faster and larger as a result -- CO2 is plant food, after all.
Posted by: Jock the Salmon   2011-04-14 12:15  

#9  I dunno about that carbon dioxide claim. Wouldn't the oxygen produced the plants themselves offset the carbon dioxide?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2011-04-14 11:55  

#8  I had this article saved a while to use!

Researchers argue 'addiction' a poor way to understand the normal use of drugs
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2011-04-14 10:50  

#7  And in other news, Montana's Democrat governor vetoes Republican legislation to overturn the popular 2004 voter initiative approved medical marijuana law.

Schweitzer vetoed the bill Wednesday along with several others he called “frivolous, unconstitutional or in direct contradiction to the expressed will of the people of Montana.”
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-04-14 10:27  

#6  To start with, AZ goes medical marijuana legal today.

Back in 1972, there was a documentary called "Weed" which was unintentionally hilarious. One part was interviewing a Midwest highway patrolman, as he took the crew through a wild marijuana patch. He estimated that over a four State area there were some 1m acres of this, what he called "Kansas utility-grade grunt weed."

Then, the crew went to Thailand, where some of the highest quality marijuana in the world was sold in bunches on the street, as the narrator held up a huge bunch, still on the stems, and excitedly said that it was just 25 cents!

But right then, the camera work got rather sloppy, and they didn't film any more for two weeks. The narrator then said, looking very tired, with red and bleary eyes, that it was time for them to return home to the US.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-04-14 09:09  

#5  So we need to add legalizing pot growing to the list of ways to save the environment (gotta be better than mandating curly-fried light bulbs.)
Posted by: Glenmore   2011-04-14 09:00  

#4  Reminds me of the story of the FBI finding a large stand of "GRASS" and spying on it for months,
Finally an old farmer came out with his tractor and bush hog, he proceeded to cut them down.

The Feds rushed over to stop him Yelling "What are you doing".

The farmer stopped his tractor and repied

'Cutting the weeds, they grow every year, and I cut them each year"
(Marijuana IS a Natural weed.)

The Feds were Pissed, they'd watched this "Plot" for months, and it wasn't a plot, Just weeds.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2011-04-14 08:23  

#3  In California, some 400,000 authorized growers

That must make it California's biggest industry.
Posted by: phil_b   2011-04-14 08:13  

#2  Ummm , then the people could see and destroy them?
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2011-04-14 08:05  

#1  Whoa! Who let this cat out of the bag?

But maybe the point, (in San Franciso, anyway), is that it is a trifling matter, only 1%. Not nearly as bad as those nasty powerplants.

So why use that nasty electricity to generate artifical light to grow pot? Why not use good ol' California sunshine? Not fast enough?
Posted by: Bobby   2011-04-14 07:30  

00:00